fix(deps): upgrade sdk to 0.30.0 in service

[elizabethhealy]

Proposed Changes

• upgrade sdk

Checklist

• I have added or updated unit tests
• I have added or updated integration tests (if appropriate)
• I have added or updated documentation

Testing Instructions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated an underlying platform component to the latest supported version.
  • No direct end-user features or behavior changes are included.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 8d3b2bdb-b14f-4396-b602-5f50e0368646

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d1833ad and bc30853.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• service/go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• service/go.mod

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The service module updates its direct github.com/opentdf/platform/sdk dependency from v0.29.0 to v0.30.0.

Changes

SDK dependency upgrade

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update service SDK requirement service/go.mod	The service module requirement changes from SDK v0.29.0 to v0.30.0.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• opentdf/platform#3658: Updates the direct SDK dependency in service/go.mod.
• opentdf/platform#3721: Updates the direct SDK dependency to a newer version.

Suggested labels: comp:sdk

Suggested reviewers: jakedoublev, c-r33d

Poem

A rabbit checks the module line,
“The SDK hops forward, version fine!”
From thirty-nine? No, thirty-oh,
A tidy change makes services grow.
Hop hop! the lockstep path is clear.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the SDK dependency upgrade from the changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch upgrade-sdk-in-service-to-0.30.0

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

Benchmark results, click to expand

Benchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:

Metric	Value
Approved Decision Requests	1000
Denied Decision Requests	0
Total Time	299.088106ms

Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:

Metric	Value
Approved Decision Requests	1000
Denied Decision Requests	0
Total Time	165.45893ms

Benchmark Statistics

Name	№ Requests	Avg Duration	Min Duration	Max Duration

Bulk Benchmark Results

Metric	Value
Total Decrypts	100
Successful Decrypts	100
Failed Decrypts	0
Total Time	436.333241ms
Throughput	229.18 requests/second

TDF3 Benchmark Results:

Metric	Value
Total Requests	5000
Successful Requests	5000
Failed Requests	0
Concurrent Requests	50
Total Time	40.930622896s
Average Latency	408.516983ms
Throughput	122.16 requests/second

[github-actions]

X-Test Results

✅ go@main-pull-3859
✅ go@pull-3859-main
✅ go@pull-3859-pull-3859
✅ go@pull-3859-v0.9.0
✅ go@main-main
✅ go@main-v0.9.0
cukes-report
✅ java@main-main
✅ js@main-pull-3859
✅ js@main-v0.9.0
✅ java@main-v0.9.0
✅ js@main-main
✅ java@main-pull-3859
opentdfplatformG1A7KH.dockerbuild
govulncheck-failure-5
govulncheck-failure-8
govulncheck-failure-1
govulncheck-failure-2
govulncheck-failure-3
govulncheck-failure-0