-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
chore(Issue 78): integration tests for key_access_server registry db interactions #104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(Issue 78): integration tests for key_access_server registry db interactions #104
Conversation
…lic key locations
| common.MetadataMutable metadata = 1; | ||
|
|
||
| string name = 2 [(buf.validate.field).required = true]; | ||
| string key_access_server = 2 [(buf.validate.field).required = true]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is key_access_server the best name for this field, or could we use one more descriptive like uri, location, or address for this proto field and DB column name since my understanding is it's the address of the running KAS? Is there a case where name/key_access_server/tbd_column_name is not pointing to a server address?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea, I think uri makes a lot of sense. Although I would not validate the URI at this time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall I proceed with that value, or is there additional input we need to move forward with the decision?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jakedoublev yea let's make the update now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated in 439feef
…er to uri and update protos, db, sdk
jrschumacher
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addresses #78