-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
golf=bunker should use surface #534
Comments
Earlier this year, the wiki still recommended
Oh, really? What other types of bunkers exist? FWIW, at least the USGA considers bunkers to be a term specific for sandy obstacles:
|
in some cases multiple primary tags may apply (though in this case using BTW, #409 appears to request exact opposite |
https://www.golfcompendium.com/2019/10/grass-bunker.html Admittedly, they're much rarer, but they do exist, even in the US. |
Hm… these things should probably be mapped as
|
Disagree. Do you have any OSM examples? |
|
?!? I'll discuss these on another forum as this one is inappropriate.
|
Feel free to ping me here or via mail if that is not tagging mailing list or OSM wiki with ping template being used. And this combination is perfectly fine. |
What you're actually quoting is The R&A. (I believe they're on the telly at the moment). Their concern is with the likes of competition courses. Around the world there are hundreds of smaller courses, municipal run pitch 'n' putt etc which can have grass covered craters to reduce maintenance costs. |
To check, are there any other tags prescribing https://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/natural/sand&***/surface/sand |
Given it's been agreed in #203 that other golf features use the surface tag to indicate their, err... surface, it appears illogical to auto add natural=sand to golf=bunker.
natural=* is a primary tag, designed to be used in isolation, not a supplementary, sub/adjective tag.
Oh, and not all bunkers are sand.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: