Bug 1879607: bump-k8s-to-1.19.2 by tssurya · Pull Request #219 · openshift/sdn

tssurya · 2020-11-11T15:20:01Z

This PR rebases sdn on k8sv1.19.2.
Also includes the upstream PR openshift/kubernetes@6e071b2

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-11T15:20:11Z

@tssurya: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1879607, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1879607: bump-k8s-to-1.19.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

tssurya · 2020-11-11T18:13:44Z

/test verify-deps

tssurya · 2020-11-11T18:51:29Z

/hold until all tests pass

tssurya · 2020-11-11T18:58:46Z

wtf! locally I don't see any of the errors seen on the ci/prow/verify-deps job.

< # sigs.k8s.io/yaml => sigs.k8s.io/yaml v1.2.0
ERROR: Content of 'vendor/' directory doesn't match 'go.mod' configuration and the overrides in 'deps.diff'!
Did you run go mod vendor?
If this is an intentional change (a carry patch) please update the 'deps.diff' using 'make update-deps-overrides'.
make: **** [verify-deps] Error 1

make has no right to swear I should be the one swearing -_- . Will take a look at this tomorrow,

tssurya · 2020-11-12T15:38:54Z

/test verify-deps

tssurya · 2020-11-12T15:57:31Z

/test verify-deps

tssurya · 2020-11-13T11:11:56Z

/retest

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-13T19:01:57Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tssurya
To complete the pull request process, please assign rcarrillocruz after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @rcarrillocruz in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

tssurya · 2020-11-13T20:21:18Z

wtf! locally I don't see any of the errors seen on the ci/prow/verify-deps job.

< # sigs.k8s.io/yaml => sigs.k8s.io/yaml v1.2.0
ERROR: Content of 'vendor/' directory doesn't match 'go.mod' configuration and the overrides in 'deps.diff'!
Did you run go mod vendor?
If this is an intentional change (a carry patch) please update the 'deps.diff' using 'make update-deps-overrides'.
make: **** [verify-deps] Error 1

make has no right to swear I should be the one swearing -_- . Will take a look at this tomorrow,

ok this was happening because the ci-job was using golang 1.13 and I had 1.15.

tssurya · 2020-11-16T13:41:29Z

/hold

tssurya · 2020-11-16T14:00:00Z

gosh did I mess up metrics point healthcheck somewhere? Cluster in trouble May day: Warning Unhealthy 116s (x18 over 3m21s) kubelet, ci-ln-p3sg3qt-f76d1-mtk45-master-2 Readiness probe failed:

looking into this.

tssurya · 2020-11-18T18:52:59Z

gosh did I mess up metrics point healthcheck somewhere? Cluster in trouble May day: Warning Unhealthy 116s (x18 over 3m21s) kubelet, ci-ln-p3sg3qt-f76d1-mtk45-master-2 Readiness probe failed:

looking into this.

had to update this patch to accommodate this change: kubernetes/kubernetes@8747ba9

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-18T18:56:40Z

@tssurya: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1879607, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1879607: bump-k8s-to-1.19.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-18T18:56:44Z

@tssurya: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1879607, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.7.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.7.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1879607: bump-k8s-to-1.19.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

tssurya · 2020-11-18T21:02:22Z

/test e2e-gcp

tssurya · 2020-11-19T09:30:40Z

/retest

tssurya · 2020-11-19T14:43:28Z

/test e2e-gcp

tssurya · 2020-11-19T16:17:13Z

ok so the CI failures seem unrelated:
/cancel hold

tssurya · 2020-11-19T16:18:39Z

/hold cancel

tssurya · 2020-11-20T09:54:58Z

/retest

tssurya · 2020-11-22T14:59:05Z

/retest

tssurya · 2020-11-23T16:39:10Z

/test e2e-aws

tssurya · 2020-11-24T10:37:11Z

/test e2e-gcp

tssurya · 2020-11-24T13:58:35Z

/test e2e-gcp

tssurya · 2020-11-25T09:59:21Z

/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-aws

tssurya · 2020-11-26T12:50:05Z

/retest

tssurya · 2020-11-26T13:44:36Z

/hold

It seems like something is again wrong specific to this patch:

level=info msg=Cluster operator network Progressing is True with Deploying: DaemonSet "openshift-multus/network-metrics-daemon" is not available (awaiting 3 nodes)
level=info msg=DaemonSet "openshift-multus/multus-admission-controller" is not available (awaiting 3 nodes)

investigating....

tssurya · 2020-12-01T14:12:23Z

/retest

openshift-merge-robot · 2020-12-01T16:46:05Z

@tssurya: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade	`274c4f3`	link	`/test e2e-aws-upgrade`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp	`274c4f3`	link	`/test e2e-gcp`
ci/prow/e2e-aws	`274c4f3`	link	`/test e2e-aws`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

danwinship · 2020-12-04T18:39:34Z

obsoleted by #227 which updates to 1.20
/close

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-04T18:39:51Z

@danwinship: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

obsoleted by #227 which updates to 1.20
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-12-04T18:39:56Z

@tssurya: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1879607. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1879607: bump-k8s-to-1.19.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 11, 2020

openshift-ci-robot requested review from alexanderConstantinescu and danielmellado November 11, 2020 15:21

tssurya force-pushed the bump-k8s-to-1.19.2 branch 2 times, most recently from 1c98afa to c13bf7f Compare November 11, 2020 16:26

tssurya force-pushed the bump-k8s-to-1.19.2 branch 2 times, most recently from 6bcc58f to c6edc6b Compare November 11, 2020 18:51

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 11, 2020

tssurya force-pushed the bump-k8s-to-1.19.2 branch 3 times, most recently from 1dbf538 to 578b8d0 Compare November 12, 2020 15:22

tssurya force-pushed the bump-k8s-to-1.19.2 branch 2 times, most recently from dbcb835 to 9531821 Compare November 13, 2020 19:01

tssurya force-pushed the bump-k8s-to-1.19.2 branch from 9531821 to 2a7410b Compare November 13, 2020 20:14

tssurya force-pushed the bump-k8s-to-1.19.2 branch from 2a7410b to ae5259e Compare November 18, 2020 18:54

openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 19, 2020

bump-k8s-to-1.19.2

274c4f3

tssurya force-pushed the bump-k8s-to-1.19.2 branch from ae5259e to 274c4f3 Compare November 23, 2020 15:14

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 26, 2020

danwinship mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2020

update to kube 1.20 #227

Merged

openshift-ci-robot closed this Dec 4, 2020

Conversation

tssurya commented Nov 11, 2020 • edited by openshift-ci-robot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 12, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 13, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 13, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 13, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 16, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 16, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 18, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 18, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 18, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 18, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 19, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 19, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 19, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 19, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 20, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 22, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 23, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 24, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 24, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 25, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 26, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Nov 26, 2020

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Dec 1, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-robot commented Dec 1, 2020

Uh oh!

danwinship commented Dec 4, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 4, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 4, 2020

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

4 participants

tssurya commented Nov 11, 2020 •

edited by openshift-ci-robot

Loading