-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
[release-4.13] OCPBUGS-13967, OCPBUGS-13964: Handle mTLS CRLs, and fix accidental CRL duplication #485
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The CRLs on disk don't include enough information to accurately determine which CA certificate they were downloaded for. Instead of re-parsing the CRLs on disk, keep them in a map indexed by the CA's subject key, so we can avoid unnecessary downloads and incorrect attribution.
Allows easier backporting to releases reliant on go 1.18 or older
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-9464 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13964. Will retitle bug to link to clone. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13964, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retitle [release-4.13] OCPBUGS-13967, OCPBUGS-13964: Handle mTLS CRLs, and fix accidental CRL duplication |
|
/lgtm |
|
/retest |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/approve |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@lihongan: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13964, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/approve The purpose of this PR is to move logic to the router that is being removed from cluster-ingress-operator with openshift/cluster-ingress-operator#935. This logic is covered by E2E tests in cluster-ingress-operator. We have discussed and addressed implications for upgrades (operator as well as operand) and for the cluster-wide egress proxy (which the operator now configures the router to use, if applicable, to download CRLs). Engineering and QE have tested these changes extensively and have not found any other issues. /label backport-risk-assessed |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: frobware, Miciah The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13964: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged: These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Jira Issue OCPBUGS-13964 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/label qe-approved |
|
/remove-label qe-approved removing label. incorrectly thought this was pre-merge tested |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.13.0-0.nightly-2023-06-06-122318 |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #472
/assign rfredette