Skip to content

ovn-kubernetes release-4.21: Update build root image to golang-1.24#75059

Closed
ricky-rav wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
ricky-rav:fix-ovnk-release-4.21-golang-image
Closed

ovn-kubernetes release-4.21: Update build root image to golang-1.24#75059
ricky-rav wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
ricky-rav:fix-ovnk-release-4.21-golang-image

Conversation

@ricky-rav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The go.mod on the release-4.21 branch requires go 1.24.0, but the CI build root image was still using rhel-9-release-golang-1.22-openshift-4.19 (Go 1.22.9). This previously worked because the toolchain go1.24.5 directive in go.mod triggered automatic toolchain download, but a recent change in the base image now sets GOTOOLCHAIN=local, preventing that fallback.

Update the build root image to rhel-9-release-golang-1.24-openshift-4.21 to match the Go version required by the branch.

The go.mod on the release-4.21 branch requires go 1.24.0, but the CI
build root image was still using rhel-9-release-golang-1.22-openshift-4.19
(Go 1.22.9). This previously worked because the `toolchain go1.24.5`
directive in go.mod triggered automatic toolchain download, but a recent
change in the base image now sets GOTOOLCHAIN=local, preventing that
fallback.

Update the build root image to rhel-9-release-golang-1.24-openshift-4.21
to match the Go version required by the branch.

Assisted by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Riccardo Ravaioli <rravaiol@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 18, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ricky-rav
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign knobunc for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
@ricky-rav: the pj-rehearse plugin accommodates running rehearsal tests for the changes in this PR. Expand 'Interacting with pj-rehearse' for usage details. The following rehearsable tests have been affected by this change:

Test name Repo Type Reason
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-4.21-upgrade-from-stable-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-4.21-upgrade-from-stable-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-ipsec openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-4.21-upgrade-from-stable-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-4.21-upgrade-from-stable-4.20-images openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-agent-compact-ipv4 openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-clusternetwork-cidr-expansion openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-fdp-qe openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-local-gateway openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-local-to-shared-gateway-mode-migration openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-serial openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-ipsec openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-shared-to-local-gateway-mode-migration openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-ipsec openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-local-gateway openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-windows openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-azure-ovn openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-release-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn openshift/ovn-kubernetes presubmit Ci-operator config changed

A total of 73 jobs have been affected by this change. The above listing is non-exhaustive and limited to 25 jobs.

A full list of affected jobs can be found here
Prior to this PR being merged, you will need to either run and acknowledge or opt to skip these rehearsals.

Interacting with pj-rehearse

Comment: /pj-rehearse to run up to 5 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse skip to opt-out of rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse {test-name}, with each test separated by a space, to run one or more specific rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse more to run up to 10 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse max to run up to 25 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse auto-ack to run up to 5 rehearsals, and add the rehearsals-ack label on success
Comment: /pj-rehearse list to get an up-to-date list of affected jobs
Comment: /pj-rehearse abort to abort all active rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse network-access-allowed to allow rehearsals of tests that have the restrict_network_access field set to false. This must be executed by an openshift org member who is not the PR author

Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: /pj-rehearse ack to unblock merge. When the rehearsals-ack label is present on your PR, merge will no longer be blocked by rehearsals.
If you would like the rehearsals-ack label removed, comment: /pj-rehearse reject to re-block merging.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 18, 2026

@ricky-rav: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ricky-rav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jluhrsen the lint job in this 4.21 openshift/ovn-kubernetes PR (openshift/ovn-kubernetes#2984) is failing. We can't run a pj-rehearse lint job from here, can we? Thanks!

@jluhrsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jluhrsen the lint job in this 4.21 openshift/ovn-kubernetes PR (openshift/ovn-kubernetes#2984) is failing. We can't run a pj-rehearse lint job from here, can we? Thanks!

@ricky-rav No, I don't know of a way to do that. Also, I think we want to do it this way instead.

@ricky-rav ricky-rav closed this Feb 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants