Skip to content

Conversation

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented Jul 11, 2019

One previous branches, you need to checkout the correct levels or the CI will never go green.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jul 11, 2019
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 11, 2019

Well, the failure points to a line that doesn't exist. Nice.

https://github.com/openshift/client-go/tree/release-4.1/operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator

ned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/fake/fake_imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:62:75: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/fake/fake_imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:72:75: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/fake/fake_imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:97:127: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/fake/fake_imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:47:29: too many errors
# github.com/openshift/client-go/operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:24:10: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:25:10: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:28:44: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:29:30: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicyList
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:31:87: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:32:2: undefined: ImageContentSourcePolicyExpansion
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:48:87: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:60:73: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicyList
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:90:71: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:101:71: undefined: v1alpha1.ImageContentSourcePolicy
operator/clientset/versioned/typed/operator/v1alpha1/imagecontentsourcepolicy.go:101:71: too many errors

Anyone see the problem in the checkout statement?

@deads2k deads2k force-pushed the verify-client-go branch from 318efea to 8bec259 Compare July 11, 2019 12:57
@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

... how are you not on the right branch in the first place?

@stevekuznetsov
Copy link
Contributor

do you have checkout logs from a bad job?

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented Jul 11, 2019

Yeah, I need to fix this: openshift/api#375

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Jul 12, 2019

Ugly.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 12, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 6daa3ff into openshift:master Jul 12, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k: Updated the following 6 configmaps:

  • ci-operator-4.2-configs configmap in namespace ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-api-release-4.2.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/api/openshift-api-release-4.2.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.2-configs configmap in namespace ci-stg using the following files:
    • key openshift-api-release-4.2.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/api/openshift-api-release-4.2.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.3-configs configmap in namespace ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-api-release-4.3.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/api/openshift-api-release-4.3.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.3-configs configmap in namespace ci-stg using the following files:
    • key openshift-api-release-4.3.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/api/openshift-api-release-4.3.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.1-configs configmap in namespace ci using the following files:
    • key openshift-api-release-4.1.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/api/openshift-api-release-4.1.yaml
  • ci-operator-4.1-configs configmap in namespace ci-stg using the following files:
    • key openshift-api-release-4.1.yaml using file ci-operator/config/openshift/api/openshift-api-release-4.1.yaml
Details

In response to this:

One previous branches, you need to checkout the correct levels or the CI will never go green.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants