GCP account is provisioned for 150 networks, bump to 120 clusters #10050
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Increase the GCP limit to closer to our limits.
Contributor
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: smarterclayton The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
approved
Contributor
|
@smarterclayton: Updated the following 2 configmaps:
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
wking
added a commit
to wking/openshift-release
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 2, 2020
We'd raised them from 80 to 120 in 1fb9779 (GCP account is provisioned for 150 networks, bump to 120 clusters, 2020-07-02, openshift#10050), after (unspecified?) limit bumps. But recently we've been hitting [1]: level=error msg="Error: Request \"Create IAM Members roles/compute.viewer serviceAccount:ci-ln-4bw2v62-f76d1-685n4-w@openshift-gce-devel-ci.iam.gserviceaccount.com for \\\"project \\\\\\\"openshift-gce-devel-ci\\\\\\\"\\\"\" returned error: Batch request and retried single request \"Create IAM Members roles/compute.viewer serviceAccount:ci-ln-4bw2v62-f76d1-685n4-w@openshift-gce-devel-ci.iam.gserviceaccount.com for \\\"project \\\\\\\"openshift-gce-devel-ci\\\\\\\"\\\"\" both failed. Final error: Error applying IAM policy for project \"openshift-gce-devel-ci\": Error setting IAM policy for project \"openshift-gce-devel-ci\": googleapi: Error 400: The number of members in the policy (1,501) is larger than the maximum allowed size 1,500., badRequest" Patrick counts six installer-created bindings and 12 additional cloud-cred-operator-created bindings per cluster, which gives space for 83 clusters. Dropping the Boskos cap to 80 leaves 60 bindings free for long-lived IAM users (e.g. the user we use to create clusters and users associated with human admins). If, in the future, we transition more of our CI to passthrough-mode credentials (instead of the current mint-mode credentials), we would have space for more CI clusters under our current policy-member quota. Generated by editing generate-boskos.py and then running: $ hack/validate-boskos.sh [1]: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-launch-gcp/1333696073952137216
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Increase the GCP limit to closer to our limits.