OCPBUGS-77795: Updating ovn-kubernetes-microshift-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22

[openshift-bot]

Updating ovn-kubernetes-microshift-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ovn-kubernetes-microshift.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
  a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
  canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
  only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
  a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
  canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
  from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="OCPBUGS-77816: Updating ose-ovn-kubernetes-base-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22", number=3023) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

[openshift-bot]

Created by ART pipeline job run https://art-jenkins.apps.prod-stable-spoke1-dc-iad2.itup.redhat.com/job/scheduled-builds/job/sync-ci-images/49476

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77795, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jogeo

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Updating ovn-kubernetes-microshift-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ovn-kubernetes-microshift.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
  a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
  canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
  only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
  a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
  canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="Updating ose-ovn-kubernetes-base-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22", number=3023) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jluhrsen]

/retest-required

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77795, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jogeo

Details

In response to this:

Updating ovn-kubernetes-microshift-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ovn-kubernetes-microshift.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
  a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
  canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
  only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
  a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
  canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="OCPBUGS-77816: Updating ose-ovn-kubernetes-base-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22", number=3023) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jluhrsen]

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: An error was encountered searching for bug OCPBUGS-77795 on the Jira server at https://issues.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.

No response returned: Get "https://issues.redhat.com/rest/api/2/issue/OCPBUGS-77795": GET https://issues.redhat.com/rest/api/2/issue/OCPBUGS-77795 giving up after 5 attempt(s)

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Updating ovn-kubernetes-microshift-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ovn-kubernetes-microshift.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
  a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
  canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
  only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
  a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
  canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="OCPBUGS-77816: Updating ose-ovn-kubernetes-base-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22", number=3023) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77795, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jogeo

Details

In response to this:

Updating ovn-kubernetes-microshift-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ovn-kubernetes-microshift.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
  a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
  canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
  only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
  a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
  canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="OCPBUGS-77816: Updating ose-ovn-kubernetes-base-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22", number=3023) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jluhrsen]

/test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fdp-qe
/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift
/test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

[jluhrsen]

/retest

[tssurya]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [tssurya]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[tssurya]

/tide refresh

[tssurya]

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

I am overriding edge zones because this PR Is just bumping golang, the failure https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ovn-kubernetes/3039/pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones/2036139201044418560 is unrelated:

ERRO[2026-03-23T18:47:47Z] Some steps failed:                           
ERRO[2026-03-23T18:47:47Z] 
  * could not run steps: step e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones failed: "e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones" pre steps failed: "e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones" pod "e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones-ipi-aws-pre-edge-zones-opt-in" failed: could not watch pod: the pod ci-op-vz4isv3q/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones-ipi-aws-pre-edge-zones-opt-in failed after 16s (failed containers: test): ContainerFailed one or more containers exited
Container test exited with code 254, reason Error

image builds just fine.

[openshift-ci]

@tssurya: Overrode contexts on behalf of tssurya: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

I am overriding edge zones because this PR Is just bumping golang, the failure https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ovn-kubernetes/3039/pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-master-e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones/2036139201044418560 is unrelated:

ERRO[2026-03-23T18:47:47Z] Some steps failed:                           
ERRO[2026-03-23T18:47:47Z] 
 * could not run steps: step e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones failed: "e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones" pre steps failed: "e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones" pod "e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones-ipi-aws-pre-edge-zones-opt-in" failed: could not watch pod: the pod ci-op-vz4isv3q/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones-ipi-aws-pre-edge-zones-opt-in failed after 16s (failed containers: test): ContainerFailed one or more containers exited
Container test exited with code 254, reason Error

image builds just fine.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[tssurya]

/override ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes
associated thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C020CKMP6CT/p1771508205301039?thread_ts=1771101156.062779&cid=C020CKMP6CT and https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/GQ0CU2623/p1771848596455029?thread_ts=1771338827.722999&cid=GQ0CU2623
plausible fix: kube-burner/kube-burner-ocp#399

[openshift-ci]

@tssurya: Overrode contexts on behalf of tssurya: ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes
associated thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C020CKMP6CT/p1771508205301039?thread_ts=1771101156.062779&cid=C020CKMP6CT and https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/GQ0CU2623/p1771848596455029?thread_ts=1771338827.722999&cid=GQ0CU2623
plausible fix: kube-burner/kube-burner-ocp#399

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[tssurya]

/tide refresh

[tssurya]

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp

level=debug msg=scp: dest open "./installer-masters-gather.sh": Permission denied
level=debug msg=scp: failed to upload file /usr/local/bin/installer-masters-gather.sh to .
level=debug msg=Warning: Permanently added '172.22{"component":"entrypoint","file":"sigs.k8s.io/prow/pkg/entrypoint/run.go:169","func":"sigs.k8s.io/prow/pkg/entrypoint.Options.ExecuteProcess","level":"error","msg":"Process did not finish before 2h0m0s timeout","severity":"error","time":"2026-03-23T20:20:07Z"}
{"component":"entrypoint","file":"sigs.k8s.io/prow/pkg/entrypoint/run.go:267","func":"sigs.k8s.io/prow/pkg/entrypoint.gracefullyTerminate","level":"error","msg":"Process did not exit before 10m0s grace period","severity":"error","time":"2026-03-23T20:30:07Z"}
{"component":"entrypoint","error":"process timed out","file":"sigs.k8s.io/prow/pkg/entrypoint/run.go:84","func":"sigs.k8s.io/prow/pkg/entrypoint.Options.internalRun","level":"error","msg":"Error executing test process","severity":"error","time":"2026-03-23T20:30:07Z"}
error: failed to execute wrapped command: exit status 127 
INFO[2026-03-23T20:30:08Z] Step e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw-baremetalds-devscripts-setup failed after 2h10m7s. 
INFO[2026-03-23T20:30:08Z] Step phase pre failed after 2h15m38s.        
INFO[2026-03-23T20:30:08Z] Running multi-stage phase post            

unrelated issue: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ovn-kubernetes/3039/pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw/2036141996720001024 build succeeded just fine

[knobunc]

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

[openshift-ci]

@knobunc: Overrode contexts on behalf of knobunc: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[knobunc]

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

Because it is not required, but the bot thinks it is (stale data)

[openshift-ci]

@knobunc: Overrode contexts on behalf of knobunc: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

Because it is not required, but the bot thinks it is (stale data)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[knobunc]

/tide refresh

[knobunc]

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp

[openshift-ci]

@knobunc: Overrode contexts on behalf of knobunc: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[knobunc]

/override ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes

[openshift-ci]

@knobunc: Overrode contexts on behalf of knobunc: ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[openshift-ci]

@openshift-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/security	59a367d	link	false	/test security
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-rhcos10-techpreview	59a367d	link	false	/test e2e-aws-ovn-rhcos10-techpreview

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[tssurya]

/tide refresh

[tssurya]

/shrug

[tssurya]

/skip

[jluhrsen]

/tide refresh

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-aws-ovn-local-to-shared-gateway-mode-migration

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

[arkadeepsen]

/test 4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
/test 4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

[tssurya]

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift

[openshift-ci]

@tssurya: Overrode contexts on behalf of tssurya: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[tssurya]

/tide refresh

[arkadeepsen]

/tide refresh

[arkadeepsen]

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

[arkadeepsen]

/test 4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

[tssurya]

/override ci/prow/4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

[openshift-ci]

@tssurya: Overrode contexts on behalf of tssurya: ci/prow/4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[tssurya]

/tide refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@openshift-bot: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77795
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77795 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Updating ovn-kubernetes-microshift-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22
TLDR:
Product builds by ART can be configured for different base and builder images than corresponding CI
builds. This automated PR requests a change to CI configuration to align with ART's configuration;
please take steps to merge it quickly or contact ART to coordinate changes.

The configuration in the following ART component metadata is driving this alignment request:
ovn-kubernetes-microshift.yml.

Detail:

This repository is out of sync with the downstream product builds for this component. The CI
configuration for at least one image differs from ART's expected product configuration. This should
be addressed to ensure that the component's CI testing accurate reflects what customers will
experience.

Most of these PRs are opened as an ART-driven proposal to migrate base image or builder(s) to a
different version, usually prior to GA. The intent is to effect changes in both configurations
simultaneously without breaking either CI or ART builds, so usually ART builds are configured to
consider CI as canonical and attempt to match CI config until the PR merges to align both. ART may
also configure changes in GA releases with CI remaining canonical for a brief grace period to enable
CI to succeed and the alignment PR to merge. In either case, ART configuration will be made
canonical at some point (typically at branch-cut before GA or release dev-cut after GA), so it is
important to align CI configuration as soon as possible.

PRs are also triggered when CI configuration changes without ART coordination, for instance to
change the number of builder images or to use a different golang version. These changes should be
coordinated with ART; whether ART configuration is canonical or not, preferably it would be updated
first to enable the changes to occur simultaneously in both CI and ART at the same time. This also
gives ART a chance to validate the intended changes first. For instance, ART compiles most
components with the Golang version being used by the control plane for a given OpenShift release.
Exceptions to this convention (i.e. you believe your component must be compiled with a Golang
version independent from the control plane) must be granted by the OpenShift staff engineers and
communicated to the ART team.

Roles & Responsibilities:

• Component owners are responsible for ensuring these alignment PRs merge with passing
  tests OR that necessary metadata changes are reported to the ART team: @release-artists
  in #forum-ocp-art on Slack. If necessary, the changes required by this pull request can be
  introduced with a separate PR opened by the component team. Once the repository is aligned,
  this PR will be closed automatically.
• In particular, it could be that a job like verify-deps is complaining. In that case, please open
  a new PR with the dependency issues addressed (and base images bumped). ART-9595 for reference.
• Patch-manager or those with sufficient privileges within this repository may add
  any required labels to ensure the PR merges once tests are passing. In cases where ART config is
  canonical, downstream builds are already being built with these changes, and merging this PR
  only improves the fidelity of our CI. In cases where ART config is not canonical, this provides
  a grace period for the component team to align their CI with ART's configuration before it becomes
  canonical in product builds.

ART has been configured to reconcile your CI build root image (see https://docs.ci.openshift.org/docs/architecture/ci-operator/#build-root-image).
In order for your upstream .ci-operator.yaml configuration to be honored, you must set the following in your openshift/release ci-operator configuration file:

build_root:
 from_repository: true

Change behavior of future PRs:

• In case you just want to follow the base images that ART suggests, you can configure additional labels to be
  set up automatically. This means that such a PR would merge without human intervention (and awareness!) in the future.
  To do so, open a PR to set the auto_label attribute in the image configuration. Example
• You can set a commit prefix, like UPSTREAM: <carry>: . An example.

If you have any questions about this pull request, please reach out to @release-artists in the #forum-ocp-art coreos slack channel.

Depends on PullRequest(title="OCPBUGS-77816: Updating ose-ovn-kubernetes-base-container image to be consistent with ART for 4.22", number=3023) . Allow it to merge and then run /test all on this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-merge-robot]

Fix included in accepted release 4.22.0-0.nightly-2026-03-29-055437