OCPBUGS-64674: [release-4.17]: Configure sec nic EIPv6 address with NODAD and maximum lifetime

[jcaamano]

Cherrypick of upstream fix ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#5579 from 0e9f3c7

Conflicts:

• go-controller/pkg/node/controllers/egressip/egressip.go: import re-ordering
• go-controller/pkg/node/egressip/gateway_egressip.go: changes not needed as those were new files introduced for UDN support

Added commit in a lightweight attempt to fix compilation errors from previous backports.

[jcaamano]

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-63459

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jcaamano: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63459 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-64674. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-64674: [release-4.17]: Configure sec nic EIPv6 address with NODAD and maximum lifetime

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-63459

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jcaamano: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-64674, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note text is set and does not match the template
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63459 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63459 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
• bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Cherrypick of upstream fix ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#5579 from 0e9f3c7

Conflicts:

• go-controller/pkg/node/controllers/egressip/egressip.go: import re-ordering
• go-controller/pkg/node/egressip/gateway_egressip.go: changes not needed as those were new files introdoced for UDN support

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jcaamano: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-64674, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note text is set and does not match the template
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63459 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63459 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
• bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

Details

In response to this:

Cherrypick of upstream fix ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#5579 from 0e9f3c7

Conflicts:

• go-controller/pkg/node/controllers/egressip/egressip.go: import re-ordering
• go-controller/pkg/node/egressip/gateway_egressip.go: changes not needed as those were new files introdoced for UDN support

Added commit iin a lightweight attempt to fix compilation errors from previous backports.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jcaamano]

/override ci/prow/security

[openshift-ci]

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/security

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/security

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[jcaamano]

/retest

[jcaamano]

/retest

[jcaamano]

/override ci/prow/4.17-upgrade-from-stable-4.16-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

Unrelated failure
https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CK1AE4ZCK/p1762421249897769

[openshift-ci]

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/4.17-upgrade-from-stable-4.16-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/4.17-upgrade-from-stable-4.16-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

Unrelated failure
https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/CK1AE4ZCK/p1762421249897769

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[kyrtapz]

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcaamano, kyrtapz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jcaamano,kyrtapz]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[huiran0826]

/verified by @huiran0826

[openshift-ci-robot]

@huiran0826: This PR has been marked as verified by @huiran0826.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @huiran0826

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b0bc347 and 2 for PR HEAD 43b2d93 in total

[jcaamano]

/retest

[openshift-ci]

@jcaamano: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@jcaamano: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-64674
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-64674 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Cherrypick of upstream fix ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#5579 from 0e9f3c7

Conflicts:

• go-controller/pkg/node/controllers/egressip/egressip.go: import re-ordering
• go-controller/pkg/node/egressip/gateway_egressip.go: changes not needed as those were new files introduced for UDN support

Added commit in a lightweight attempt to fix compilation errors from previous backports.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[jcaamano]

/cherry-pick release-4.16

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@jcaamano: #2843 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.16":

Applying: Configure sec nic EIPv6 address with NODAD and maximum lifetime
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	go-controller/pkg/node/controllers/egressip/egressip.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging go-controller/pkg/node/controllers/egressip/egressip.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in go-controller/pkg/node/controllers/egressip/egressip.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 Configure sec nic EIPv6 address with NODAD and maximum lifetime

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.