OCPBUGS-62913: Configure sec nic EIPv6 address with NODAD and maximum lifetime by jcaamano · Pull Request #2797 · openshift/ovn-kubernetes

jcaamano · 2025-10-09T14:59:42Z

Aligning it to what we do for primary nic EIPv6 addresses. NODAD is required since it is possible for an EIPv6 to be configured in two nodes at the same time during a short failover time window.

(cherry picked from commit b828680)

Aligning it to what we do for primary nic EIPv6 addresses. NODAD is required since it is possible for an EIPv6 to be configured in two nodes at the same time during a short failover time window. Signed-off-by: Jaime Caamaño Ruiz <jcaamano@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit b828680)

jcaamano · 2025-10-09T15:06:20Z

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-60468

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-09T15:23:29Z

@jcaamano: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60468 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62913. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-62913: Configure sec nic EIPv6 address with NODAD and maximum lifetime

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-60468

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-09T15:29:18Z

@jcaamano: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62913, which is invalid:

release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60468 to target a version in 4.21.0, but it targets "4.21" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Aligning it to what we do for primary nic EIPv6 addresses. NODAD is required since it is possible for an EIPv6 to be configured in two nodes at the same time during a short failover time window.

(cherry picked from commit b828680)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

jcaamano · 2025-10-09T16:07:16Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-09T16:07:25Z

@jcaamano: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62913, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note text is set and does not match the template
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60468 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60468 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0
bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

tssurya

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2025-10-09T16:13:36Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcaamano, tssurya

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [jcaamano,tssurya]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

tssurya · 2025-10-10T09:16:34Z

/label backport-risk-assessed

jcaamano · 2025-10-10T12:11:58Z

/retest
/override ci/prow/lint

openshift-ci · 2025-10-10T12:12:26Z

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/lint

Details

In response to this:

/retest
/override ci/prow/lint

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

sdodson · 2025-10-11T02:44:03Z

/label staff-eng-approved

jcaamano · 2025-10-13T08:16:32Z

/retest-required
/override ci/prow/lint

openshift-ci · 2025-10-13T08:16:57Z

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/lint

Details

In response to this:

/retest-required
/override ci/prow/lint

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

jcaamano · 2025-10-14T08:48:45Z

/override ci/prow/lint

openshift-ci · 2025-10-14T08:49:01Z

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/lint

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/lint

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

huiran0826 · 2025-10-15T04:49:02Z

/verified by pre-merge testing

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-15T04:49:13Z

@huiran0826: This PR has been marked as verified by pre-merge testing.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by pre-merge testing

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-15T05:28:32Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 84cdb99 and 2 for PR HEAD 0e9f3c7 in total

sdodson · 2025-10-15T15:13:40Z

/label staff-eng-approved

jcaamano · 2025-10-15T16:04:12Z

/retest-required

sdodson · 2025-10-16T02:20:14Z

/retest-required

jcaamano · 2025-10-16T08:03:06Z

/retest-required

openshift-ci · 2025-10-16T13:08:48Z

@jcaamano: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/security	`0e9f3c7`	link	false	`/test security`
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn	`0e9f3c7`	link	false	`/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn`
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw	`0e9f3c7`	link	unknown	`/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-windows	`0e9f3c7`	link	unknown	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-windows`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn	`0e9f3c7`	link	unknown	`/test e2e-gcp-ovn`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

jcaamano · 2025-10-16T13:36:56Z

/override ci/prow/4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

The job has passed before on this same commit. All the test cases pass, the job timeouts on later stages. We are tracking this as a known issue being addressed here

openshift-ci · 2025-10-16T13:39:53Z

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

The job has passed before on this same commit. All the test cases pass, the job timeouts on later stages. We are tracking this as a known issue being addressed here

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-16T13:43:05Z

@jcaamano: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62913
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-62913 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Aligning it to what we do for primary nic EIPv6 addresses. NODAD is required since it is possible for an EIPv6 to be configured in two nodes at the same time during a short failover time window.

(cherry picked from commit b828680)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-merge-robot · 2025-10-18T22:01:11Z

Fix included in accepted release 4.20.0-0.nightly-2025-10-18-160952

openshift-ci bot changed the title ~~Configure sec nic EIPv6 address with NODAD and maximum lifetime~~ OCPBUGS-62913: Configure sec nic EIPv6 address with NODAD and maximum lifetime Oct 9, 2025

openshift-ci bot requested review from kyrtapz and tssurya October 9, 2025 15:39

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 9, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 9, 2025

openshift-ci bot requested a review from anuragthehatter October 9, 2025 16:07

tssurya approved these changes Oct 9, 2025

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot assigned tssurya Oct 9, 2025

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 9, 2025

openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 10, 2025

openshift-ci bot assigned anuragthehatter, asood-rh, barbora137, huiran0826, jechen0648, Meina-rh, mffiedler and qiowang721 Oct 10, 2025

openshift-ci bot assigned rbbratta Oct 10, 2025

openshift-ci bot added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Oct 11, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Oct 15, 2025

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 050ed2c into openshift:release-4.20 Oct 16, 2025
28 of 30 checks passed

Comments

Conversation

jcaamano commented Oct 9, 2025

Uh oh!

jcaamano commented Oct 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2025

Uh oh!

jcaamano commented Oct 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2025

Uh oh!

tssurya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Uh oh!

tssurya commented Oct 10, 2025

Uh oh!

jcaamano commented Oct 10, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2025

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Oct 11, 2025

Uh oh!

jcaamano commented Oct 13, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 13, 2025

Uh oh!

jcaamano commented Oct 14, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Uh oh!

huiran0826 commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

jcaamano commented Oct 15, 2025

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Oct 16, 2025

Uh oh!

jcaamano commented Oct 16, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

jcaamano commented Oct 16, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 16, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-robot commented Oct 18, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

14 participants

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2025 •

edited

Loading