[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-59680, OCPBUGS-48710, OCPBUGS-61748: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [07-14-2025]#2663
Conversation
|
@jluhrsen: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/payload 4.18 ci blocking |
|
@jluhrsen: trigger 4 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.18
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/b3ce2150-60f5-11f0-9f0b-220c9d622c64-0 trigger 11 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.18
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/b3ce2150-60f5-11f0-9f0b-220c9d622c64-1 |
|
/retest |
|
@jluhrsen: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/73d8eb20-6127-11f0-9208-bb96565c4671-0 |
|
/retitle [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-48710: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [07-14-2025] |
|
@jluhrsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48710, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
re-run looks good. |
|
/retest |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@jluhrsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48710, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
The commit to repin libreswan to 4.6-3.el9_0.3 looks good to me. |
|
@jluhrsen youre missing some commits from latest 4.19 - any reason? I really need it in 4.18 |
|
/retest |
this only includes what was in 4.19 at the time this PR was created. the most recent 4.19 sync landed after this was created and I think that's what you want. but, updating these sync PRs resets the timeframe for getting them merged. This one is essentially ready to land, just need two more required jobs to pass and the right labels. As soon as that happens we can get the next 4.18 sync up. |
|
/retest |
|
/retest unrelated - bgp CI is permafailing @jcaamano |
yeah, can be safely ignored in 4.18 |
|
@jluhrsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59680, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59371, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48710, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61748, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@arkadeepsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59680, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59371, which is invalid:
Comment This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48710, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61748, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Removing OCPBUGS-59371 as it's already closed. /retitle [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-59680, OCPBUGS-48710, OCPBUGS-61748: DownStream Merge Sync from 4.19 [07-14-2025] |
|
@jluhrsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59680, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48710, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61748, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/test all payloads were ugly, but I think we were in the middle of an aws outage when I tried them. just re-running the failed payloads for now: /payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.18-upgrade-from-stable-4.17-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade |
|
@jluhrsen: trigger 8 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/719cf850-9963-11f0-8c62-a6a25978e36e-0 |
|
ci has not been good recently. I think we may be better now. trying it all again: /retest all |
|
@jluhrsen: trigger 4 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.18
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/0ca0ab10-9a51-11f0-9320-1b7aa3eeb0ad-0 trigger 10 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.18
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/0ca0ab10-9a51-11f0-9320-1b7aa3eeb0ad-1 |
|
@jluhrsen: The The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs: Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Yea IMHO we should backport those API changes in CNO to stay safe, otherwise its hard to tell if we introduce some actual regression if the job continues to stay red, which it will. |
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn |
|
I think CI issues are ok now. and the payloads were great yesterday. just two to re-check, although I think one of them /retest |
|
@jluhrsen: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c22f66b0-9b0a-11f0-8169-3e5f6a9d042e-0 |
|
/retest |
|
@kyrtapz: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/1f2e79b0-9d1c-11f0-9122-bb2a661bbeac-0 |
|
@jluhrsen: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.18-upgrade-from-stable-4.17-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade |
|
@jluhrsen: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/7bb2d6d0-9d5e-11f0-80d3-dd8e9c41e3d0-0 |
|
/close |
|
@jluhrsen: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@jluhrsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59680. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-48710. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
git merge -X theirsfrom 4.19 to 4.18