Skip to content

Conversation

@jupierce
Copy link
Contributor

@jupierce jupierce commented Jan 30, 2023

OpenShift and RHEL have come to an agreement whereby OCP will be able to release the RHEL kernel before the normal 6 week cadence of RHEL. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHELPLAN-144928 tracks this agreement. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ART-5663 discussed ART/RHCOS agreement on how this would be handled at the pipeline level. The decision was to remove the constraint requiring the kernel to be source from baseos exclusively. By doing so, it ART has a more recent kernel build in its repository, it will be preferred.

Done for rhel-8 in #1129

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from aaradhak and dustymabe January 30, 2023 20:40
@travier
Copy link
Member

travier commented Jan 30, 2023

Closing as this has been moved to #1131
/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Jan 30, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 30, 2023

@travier: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Closing as this has been moved to #1131
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jupierce
Copy link
Contributor Author

@travier - I think this PR is still necessary as it will allow ART to start supplying el9 kernels fot 4.13 / master.

@jupierce jupierce reopened this Jan 31, 2023
@travier
Copy link
Member

travier commented Jan 31, 2023

OK, then it needs to be rebased on top of #1127, and the change only done for the 9.0 & 9.2 manifests, not for SCOS. Thanks

OpenShift and RHEL have come to an agreement whereby OCP will be able to release the RHEL kernel before the normal 6 week cadence of RHEL.
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHELPLAN-144928 tracks this agreement.
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/ART-5663 discussed ART/RHCOS agreement on how this would be handled at the pipeline level. The decision was to remove the constraint requiring the kernel to be source from baseos exclusively. By doing so, it ART has a more recent kernel build in its repository, it will be preferred.
@jupierce
Copy link
Contributor Author

@travier - ack updated.

Copy link
Member

@travier travier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 31, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jupierce, travier

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 31, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 6684ebe and 2 for PR HEAD 87ad45e in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 31, 2023

@jupierce: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 2b0a8b1 into openshift:master Jan 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants