Skip to content

Conversation

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: grokspawn <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: automatic mode

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and sjenning December 3, 2025 15:51
Copy link
Contributor

@ankitathomas ankitathomas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 3, 2025
Copy link
Member

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@joelanford
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I feel pretty confident that changing the owners file wouldn't cause the ci failures, so giving it a kick

/retest-required

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @xueqzhan

Hi Ken. Would you please give this PR a review?

Copy link
Member

@petr-muller petr-muller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ankitathomas, grokspawn, joelanford, petr-muller, rashmigottipati

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 3, 2025
@oceanc80
Copy link
Contributor

oceanc80 commented Dec 4, 2025

/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. label Dec 4, 2025
@grokspawn grokspawn changed the title update olm team lead NO-ISSUE: update olm team lead Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@grokspawn: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label verified
verification tooling flow doesn't make a whole bunch of sense in this scenario.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 4, 2025

@grokspawn: The label(s) /label verified cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, ok-to-test, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label verified
verification tooling flow doesn't make a whole bunch of sense in this scenario.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verify blank
verification automation flow doesn't make a lot of sense for a team lead update

@bandrade
Copy link
Contributor

bandrade commented Dec 4, 2025

/label qe-approved
/verified by @bandrade

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bandrade: This PR has been marked as verified by @bandrade.

In response to this:

/label qe-approved
/verified by @bandrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

Scheduling required tests:
/test e2e-aws-csi
/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
/test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
/test e2e-gcp-csi
/test e2e-gcp-ovn
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn
/test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD fde4688 and 2 for PR HEAD fb7d83e in total

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e76daa0 and 1 for PR HEAD fb7d83e in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@grokspawn: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit a32b6d1 into openshift:main Dec 5, 2025
16 checks passed
@grokspawn grokspawn deleted the update-olm-lead branch December 5, 2025 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

acknowledge-critical-fixes-only Indicates if the issuer of the label is OK with the policy. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants