Skip to content

Conversation

@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor

@derekhiggins derekhiggins commented Feb 1, 2023

Testing the pods immediatly after creating the daemonset leads
to failures as they may not be ready.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 1, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 1, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@derekhiggins: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6902, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/hold

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 1, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from bparees and soltysh February 1, 2023 11:30
@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 1, 2023

@derekhiggins: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/892019c0-a227-11ed-95b7-69acd2d6e798-0

@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 1, 2023

@derekhiggins: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a10a4b50-a23b-11ed-9296-56d6c0b9109d-0

Testing the pods immediatly after creating the daemonset leads
to failures as they may not be ready.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@derekhiggins: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6902, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Testing the pods immediatly after creating the daemonset leads
to failures as they may not be ready.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm-upgrade

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 1, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 1, 2023

@derekhiggins: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(job|aggregate) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm-upgrade

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/68f594a0-a258-11ed-95b1-a9c3adf40050-0

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@derekhiggins: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6902, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Testing the pods immediatly after creating the daemonset leads
to failures as they may not be ready.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh
@deads2k mind taking a look

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 2, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@derekhiggins: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6902, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @droslean

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh
@deads2k mind taking a look

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from droslean February 2, 2023 08:55
@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @droslean

@droslean
Copy link
Member

droslean commented Feb 2, 2023

/lgtm
/approve
/hold

Holding the PR to let @deads2k review it as well.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 2, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 2, 2023
@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

Here is the ipv6 upgrade payload job passing with this PR (its failure rate is somewhere around 90% at the moment)
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/openshift-origin-27699-nightly-4.13-e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade-ovn-ipv6/1620841151944724480

@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 3, 2023

@derekhiggins: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test e2e-aws-jenkins
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-image-registry
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-builds
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-image-ecosystem
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • /test extended_gssapi
  • /test extended_ldap_groups
  • /test extended_networking
  • /test images
  • /test lint
  • /test unit
  • /test verify
  • /test verify-deps

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback
  • /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
  • /test e2e-aws
  • /test e2e-aws-csi
  • /test e2e-aws-csi-migration
  • /test e2e-aws-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-multitenant
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-proxy
  • /test e2e-azure
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • /test e2e-gcp-csi
  • /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
  • /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-serial
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
  • /test e2e-openstack-kuryr
  • /test e2e-openstack-ovn
  • /test e2e-openstack-serial
  • /test e2e-vsphere
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-csi
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-openstack-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-lint
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-verify
  • pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-verify-deps
Details

In response to this:

/test required

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2023

@derekhiggins: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@derekhiggins
Copy link
Contributor Author

derekhiggins commented Feb 8, 2023

Holding the PR to let @deads2k review it as well.

Hi @deads2k would you have a few minutes to take a look

Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold
since the alternative is much better

// to cover during and after upgrade phase, and verifies the results.
func (t *UpgradeTest) Test(f *framework.Framework, done <-chan struct{}, _ upgrades.UpgradeType) {
ginkgo.By("Sleeping for a minute to give dns test pods some time to start")
time.Sleep(1 * time.Minute)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sleeps are always a bad option, a better alternative is here: #27715

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: derekhiggins, droslean
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign soltysh for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@derekhiggins: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-6902. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

Details

In response to this:

Testing the pods immediatly after creating the daemonset leads
to failures as they may not be ready.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants