Revert "Implementation for basic egressfw e2e CI test"#26967
Revert "Implementation for basic egressfw e2e CI test"#26967deads2k merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
Conversation
|
/retest |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: DennisPeriquet, stbenjam The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
Is this paired with functionality that landed? if so, that functionality should also be reverted. forcing this to repair payloads |
|
@DennisPeriquet: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Reverts #26934
A test this PR adds is having a significant impact on jobs: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?search=EgressFirewall+should+have+no+impact+outside+its+namespace&maxAge=48h&context=0&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=periodic&excludeName=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job
To unrevert this PR:
Run
/payload 4.11 nightly informingthree times.For each attempt, check job/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.11-e2e-aws-proxy ; your test (
[sig-network][Feature:EgressFirewall] EgressFirewall should have no impact outside its namespace [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]) must pass all three times.cc @msherif1234
cc @trozet