Skip to content

Conversation

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen commented Feb 20, 2019

@spadgett @enj fyi

This is just a stub, but should get us parsing & a single config named cluster. That's a win, we can follow with additional validation.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 20, 2019
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @deads2k

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @openshift/sig-master

enj
enj previously requested changes Feb 20, 2019
@enj
Copy link
Contributor

enj commented Feb 20, 2019

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2019
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Feb 20, 2019

/approve
/hold

holding to fix the create versus update. feel free to unhold after

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Feb 20, 2019
@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen force-pushed the console/console-config-validation branch from d1ddacd to afd9f65 Compare February 20, 2019 18:55
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2019
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated. @deads2k @enj, happy to get a quick glance to unhold/lgtm by anyone. Thx!

@enj
Copy link
Contributor

enj commented Feb 20, 2019

/lgtm
/hold cancel
/retest

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Feb 20, 2019
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen force-pushed the console/console-config-validation branch from afd9f65 to 52eeef4 Compare February 21, 2019 15:03
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2019
@benjaminapetersen
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebased (conflicts w/#22102). @enj care to re-lgtm?

@enj
Copy link
Contributor

enj commented Feb 21, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2019
@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen force-pushed the console/console-config-validation branch from 52eeef4 to 119e7f5 Compare February 21, 2019 20:09
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2019
@enj
Copy link
Contributor

enj commented Feb 21, 2019

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 21, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benjaminapetersen, deads2k, enj

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/master size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants