Skip to content

Conversation

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

@bparees bparees commented Feb 23, 2015

No description provided.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Feb 23, 2015

@smarterclayton per your request.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Feb 23, 2015

[test]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_requests_openshift3/1170/)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With this condition you'll still end build when To is not defined and if I understood @smarterclayton correctly he wanted to have no output defined at all.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, if Output.To==nil we'll fall through to "output=false" but still run the build, which is as desired.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

K

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Feb 25, 2015

@soltysh I moved the code to glog, i'm going to merge this but i've opened an issue to track the need for more integration tests around builds in general: #1147

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor Author

bparees commented Feb 25, 2015

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_requests_openshift3/1035/) (Image: devenv-fedora_889)

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin up to bca591c

openshift-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2015
@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit 5284955 into openshift:master Feb 25, 2015
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

soltysh commented Feb 25, 2015

@soltysh I moved the code to glog, i'm going to merge this but i've opened an issue to track the need for more integration tests around builds in general: #1147

Nice, thx 🙇

@bparees bparees deleted the optional_output branch February 27, 2015 18:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants