Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2026-01-15 09:48:00 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@60221e6 Evan Hearne OCPBUGS-65867: add config map service account to unpack jobs (#3732)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-framework

* add config map service account

* add service account lister to configmapunpacker in test

* add the service account to the job pod spec

* fix formatting issues.

* remove setting ns and name as sa object already does this

Upstream-repository: operator-lifecycle-manager
Upstream-commit: 60221e6a930c14b7a664b1d6c58645d9ae6f1d7a
@openshift-bot openshift-bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2026-01-15 09:48:00 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@60221e6 Evan Hearne OCPBUGS-65867: add config map service account to unpack jobs (#3732)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-framework

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@openshift-bot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: openshift/openshift-team-operator-framework.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2026-01-15 09:48:00 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@60221e6 Evan Hearne OCPBUGS-65867: add config map service account to unpack jobs (#3732)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-framework

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-bot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/retitle OCPBUGS-65867: Synchronize From Upstream Repositories

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title NO-ISSUE: Synchronize From Upstream Repositories OCPBUGS-65867: Synchronize From Upstream Repositories Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65867, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2026-01-15 09:48:00 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@60221e6 Evan Hearne OCPBUGS-65867: add config map service account to unpack jobs (#3732)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-framework

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/retest-required

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jianzhangbjz: This PR has been marked as verified by @jianzhangbjz.

Details

In response to this:

Test passed, details: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-65867?focusedId=28833415&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-28833415
/verified by @jianzhangbjz

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jianzhangbjz: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65867, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jianzhangbjz: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65867, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiazha@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@openshift-bot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 240820b into openshift:main Jan 16, 2026
15 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65867: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-65867 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

The staging/ and vendor/ directories have been synchronized from the upstream repositories, pulling in the following commits:

Date Commit Author Message
2026-01-15 09:48:00 operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager@60221e6 Evan Hearne OCPBUGS-65867: add config map service account to unpack jobs (#3732)

This pull request is expected to merge without any human intervention. If tests are failing here, changes must land upstream to fix any issues so that future downstreaming efforts succeed.

/cc @openshift/openshift-team-operator-framework

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants