Skip to content

Conversation

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented Jun 5, 2025

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14861 [NETOBSERV] Update netobserv-reader to netobserv-loki-reader

Version(s):
Merge to only the no-1.9 branch - no cherrypicks are required.
I will open one PR against main to incorporate all of the NetObserv content just before its GA.

Cherry-pick to OCP 4.12, 4.14, 4.16+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14861

Link to docs preview:
https://94341--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/installing-operators.html#network-observability-multi-tenancy_network_observability

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan changed the title OSDOCS-14861 [NETOBSERV] Update netobserv-reader to netobserv-loki-re… OSDOCS-14861 [NETOBSERV] Update netobserv-reader to netobserv-loki-reader Jun 5, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 5, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 5, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Amoghrd
Copy link

Amoghrd commented Jun 5, 2025

looks good to me, lets see if @jotak has any comments
/assign @jotak

@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jun 6, 2025
@cbippley
Copy link
Contributor

cbippley commented Jun 6, 2025

/label peer-review-in-progress
/remove-label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jun 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cbippley cbippley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@cbippley
Copy link
Contributor

cbippley commented Jun 6, 2025

/label peer-review-done
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Jun 6, 2025
@gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jun 6, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR and removed merge-review-in-progress Signifies that the merge review team is reviewing this PR merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Jun 6, 2025
@mburke5678 mburke5678 merged commit 2d62e87 into openshift:no-1.9 Jun 6, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants