OSDOCS-13901 NetObserv 1.9 CLI documentation updates

[gwynnemonahan]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-13901 NetObserv 1.9 CLI documentation updates

Version(s):
Merge to only the no-1.9 branch - no cherrypicks are required.
I will open one PR against main to incorporate all of the NetObserv content just before its GA.

Cherry-pick to OCP 4.12, 4.14, 4.16+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-13901

Link to docs preview:

• Flow capture options: https://93795--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/netobserv_cli/netobserv-cli-reference.html#cli-reference-flows-capture-options_netobserv-cli-reference
• Packets capture options: https://93795--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/netobserv_cli/netobserv-cli-reference.html#cli-reference-packet-capture-options_netobserv-cli-reference
• Metrics capture options: https://93795--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/netobserv_cli/netobserv-cli-reference.html#cli-reference-metrics-capture-options_netobserv-cli-reference

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Thu Jun 05 16:00:20 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://93795--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/netobserv_cli/netobserv-cli-reference.html

[jotak]

LGTM

[jpinsonneau]

LGTM, thanks @gwynnemonahan 🥳

[gwynnemonahan]

/label peer-review-needed

[mburke5678]

@gwynnemonahan Just a minor nit. Otherwise LGTM.

[openshift-ci]

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[gwynnemonahan]

/label merge-review-needed

[kcarmichael08]

The original text isn't capitalized but aren't table cell contents supposed to be capitalized? Maybe this is an exception. I'll go ahead and merge but thought I would note it.