Skip to content

OCPBUGS#35554: Clarify OLM vs CVO Operators in book index #83425

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
adellape merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024
Merged

OCPBUGS#35554: Clarify OLM vs CVO Operators in book index #83425

adellape merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

@adellape
Copy link
Contributor

@adellape adellape commented Oct 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@adellape adellape added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Oct 11, 2024
@adellape adellape added this to the Continuous Release milestone Oct 11, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 11, 2024
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Oct 11, 2024 •
edited
Loading

🤖 Mon Oct 14 20:09:40 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://83425--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/architecture/control-plane.html
https://83425--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-dedicated/latest/operators/index.html
https://83425--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/architecture/control-plane.html
https://83425--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/operators/index.html
https://83425--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/architecture/control-plane.html
https://83425--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/operators/index.html

@jianzhangbjz
Copy link
Member

jianzhangbjz commented Oct 12, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 12, 2024
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Oct 14, 2024
ShaunaDiaz
ShaunaDiaz reviewed Oct 14, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Def useful info, but I think it needs some deeper structure to aid in absorbing the concepts.

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Oct 14, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 14, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2024

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 14, 2024

@adellape: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@adellape adellape merged commit 230e6dd into openshift:main Oct 14, 2024
@adellape adellape deleted the operatorindex branch October 14, 2024 20:29
@adellape
Copy link
Contributor Author

adellape commented Oct 14, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@adellape
Copy link
Contributor Author

adellape commented Oct 14, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@adellape
Copy link
Contributor Author

adellape commented Oct 14, 2024

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 14, 2024

@adellape: new pull request created: #83471

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2024
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 14, 2024

@adellape: new pull request created: #83472

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2024
Merged
@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 14, 2024

@adellape: new pull request created: #83473

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 14, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left review comments

Assignees

@jianzhangbjz jianzhangbjz

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

Continuous Release

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@adellape @ocpdocs-previewbot @jianzhangbjz @openshift-cherrypick-robot @ShaunaDiaz