-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
CNV-17539: Document default storage provider for CNV+SNO #49607
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
68bd380 to
aee748d
Compare
akalenyu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should bring up assisted-installer here, would that be reasonable?
Just because the main focus of the epic was that
The assisted installer is now providing a new out-of-the-box storage solution.
Up until 4.11, selecting CNV on SNO meant that we also auto deploy the hostpath provisioner storage solution. Now with 4.12, we have LVMO instead (you could still use HPP).
More info can be found here:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-17537?focusedCommentId=20783231&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-20783231
80e9ae0 to
b53cd36
Compare
b53cd36 to
5e71311
Compare
|
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/2673 |
08253d6 to
cdf11b0
Compare
|
@akalenyu - This PR should be ready for final review. See the Jira link above for more details. Thanks. |
akalenyu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! I think we are really close to getting the point across
86f4423 to
6fd0f85
Compare
Thanks @akalenyu - let me know what you think of this version and we can send it to QE. |
/lgtm |
|
@akalenyu: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
240ba52 to
c82882f
Compare
|
Just FYI @akalenyu - This is transparent to you but I moved the content into the assembly, rather than the module file, as we can't have xrefs in our modules due to an internal limitation. Thanks @ousleyp for catching this...... I will wait for Jenia to QE this. If she can't get to it within the week, I'll see about getting another resource. Thanks |
|
/lgtm |
bergerhoffer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few suggestions!
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
@akalenyu - Peer review is complete. I only have one question for you. We cannot use "out-of-the-box" according to our style guidelines, mostly due to translation issues (it's kind of industry slang). Can we say "preconfigured" instead, as in: "When provisioning with the assisted installer, preconfigured persistent storage is automatically deployed". |
Definitely can. thank you |
bergerhoffer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a few last things to fix!
modules/virt-sno-differences.adoc
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This now repeats as "Single-node OpenShift OpenShift Container Platform differences". I think you should remove the {product-title} now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done, thanks.
modules/virt-sno-differences.adoc
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This now renders as "OpenShift Container Platform Data Foundation Logical Volume Manager Operator", which isn't correct. This one of those cases where it's fine to hard code "OpenShift" because it's part of the Operator name: "OpenShift Data Foundation Logical Volume Manager Operator"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Gotcha, thanks.
modules/virt-sno-differences.adoc
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
an -> a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
6e6b281 to
852c196
Compare
Moving module content to assembly
|
@bergerhoffer - This should be ready for merge/review. Thanks! |
bergerhoffer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM for merging!
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.12 |
|
@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #52325 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
For 4.12 only.
Jira: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-17539
Direct doc preview link: https://49607--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/virt/about-virt.html
Tagging Alex Kalenyuk for Code Review in Jira.
Tagging Jenia Peimer for QE Review. in Jira.