BZ1860721: adding certificate customizations

[kalexand-rh]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860721

4.6+

Preview: https://deploy-preview-34976--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/installing/installing_gcp/installing-restricted-networks-gcp.html#installation-initializing_installing-restricted-networks-gcp

[netlify]

✔️ Deploy Preview for osdocs ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: b533987

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/osdocs/deploys/6101b85f7e2c700007e6f016

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-34976--osdocs.netlify.app

[kalexand-rh]

@tsze-redhat, will you PTAL? It's easier to track the important part of this change by checking out the preview.

[tsze-redhat]

Sorry I didn't notice this before.

Looking at https://deploy-preview-34976--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/installing/installing_gcp/installing-restricted-networks-gcp.html#installation-initializing_installing-restricted-networks-gcp,

step 2 c has
Edit the install-config.yaml file to provide the additional information that is required for an installation in a restricted network.

Do you know where that comes from? It isn't a necessary step, I think. @wking Correct me here please.

Other than the above, LGTM.

Thanks.

[kalexand-rh]

Sorry I didn't notice this before.

Looking at https://deploy-preview-34976--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/installing/installing_gcp/installing-restricted-networks-gcp.html#installation-initializing_installing-restricted-networks-gcp,

step 2 c has
Edit the install-config.yaml file to provide the additional information that is required for an installation in a restricted network.

Do you know where that comes from? It isn't a necessary step, I think. @wking Correct me here please.

Other than the above, LGTM.

Thanks.

@tsze-redhat, it's applying the same GCP + restricted customizations that you approved here.

[tsze-redhat]

and I asked the same questions there too. :)

Sorry.

LGTM

Thanks.

[kalexand-rh]

and I asked the same questions there too. :)

Sorry.

LGTM

Thanks.

Thank you for taking a look! I am glad that you didn't have a new concern about this specific implementation and that it looks good. :)

[EricPonvelle]

/lgtm