Skip to content

Conversation

@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor

@jboxman jboxman commented Feb 27, 2021

@jboxman jboxman added this to the Next Release milestone Feb 27, 2021
@jboxman jboxman self-assigned this Feb 27, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 27, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 27, 2021

Deploy preview for osdocs ready!

Built with commit 245bded

https://deploy-preview-29907--osdocs.netlify.app

@jboxman jboxman added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Mar 1, 2021
@bmcelvee
Copy link
Contributor

bmcelvee commented Mar 2, 2021

LGTM!

@bmcelvee bmcelvee added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Mar 2, 2021
@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor Author

jboxman commented Mar 2, 2021

@bmcelvee thanks!

@jboxman jboxman merged commit 19ddb75 into openshift:master Mar 2, 2021
@jboxman jboxman deleted the gh-29486 branch March 2, 2021 21:57
@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor Author

jboxman commented Mar 2, 2021

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.8

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jboxman: new pull request created: #30029

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jboxman: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/openshift-docs#enterprise-4.8 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-29907-to-enterprise-4.8: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"A pull request already exists for openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-29907-to-enterprise-4.8."}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/pulls#create-a-pull-request"}

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor Author

jboxman commented Mar 2, 2021

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.7

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jboxman: new pull request created: #30034

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor Author

jboxman commented Mar 2, 2021

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.6

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jboxman: new pull request created: #30035

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor Author

jboxman commented Mar 2, 2021

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.5

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@jboxman: new pull request created: #30036

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.5 branch/enterprise-4.6 branch/enterprise-4.7 branch/enterprise-4.8 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants