Bug 1835001: added a note about viewing ChargeBack report if namespace …

[skrthomas]

added a note about viewing ChargeBack report if namespace is other than openshift-metering

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835001

This update is for for 4.5 and 4.6.

Direct link to doc preview: https://deploy-preview-29819--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/metering/metering-installing-metering.html#metering-install-operator_installing-metering

Incorporated SME comments from @EmilyM1.

[netlify]

Deploy preview for osdocs ready!

Built with commit 157aaff

https://deploy-preview-29819--osdocs.netlify.app

[EmilyM1]

Chargeback is the old name for Metering so the line should be updated to:
the Metering reports are only ....

[timflannagan]

Looks good to me.

You'll likely want to retitle this PR in the form of Bug 1835001: ... so automation picks these changes up and adds a link to this PR + moves the state of the BZ for you.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@skrthomas: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835001, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
• expected Bugzilla bug 1835001 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1835001: added a note about viewing ChargeBack report if namespace …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[skrthomas]

@timflannagan thanks for your review. Do you or @EmilyM1 have any insight into whether or not this change should also go into 4.6, 4.7, and 4.8 as well? I'm thinking yes, since I see the Metering Operator is still supported in doc but want to confirm: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/metering/metering-installing-metering.html

[timflannagan]

@skrthomas Yeah backporting to 4.6 sounds reasonable to me.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@skrthomas: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835001, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
• expected Bugzilla bug 1835001 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1835001: added a note about viewing ChargeBack report if namespace …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[skrthomas]

Ready for QE @pruan-rht

[openshift-ci-robot]

@skrthomas: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835001, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
• expected Bugzilla bug 1835001 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1835001: added a note about viewing ChargeBack report if namespace …

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[pruan-rht]

/lgtm

[skrthomas]

Closing this PR since its pulled against the wrong branch and moving changes to #30599