OCPRHV-391 Add not tested/not supported notice to OCP 4.6 and RHV 4.3 docs [enterprise-4.6][enterprise-4.5][enterprise-4.4]

[rolfedh]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPRHV-391

[sandrobonazzola]

/lgtm

[openshift-ci-robot]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[pneedle-rh]

@rolfedh I have now completed my peer review for this PR. Please let me know if you have any questions about my suggestions.

Can you please also confirm which OCP releases this PR relates to? Is this just for master and branch/enterprise-4.6? Thanks!

[pneedle-rh]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.4

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@pneedle-rh: #25821 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.4":

Applying: Update
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-customizations.adoc
M	installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-default.adoc
M	modules/installation-initializing.adoc
A	virt/virtual_machines/importing_vms/virt-importing-rhv-vm.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
CONFLICT (modify/delete): virt/virtual_machines/importing_vms/virt-importing-rhv-vm.adoc deleted in HEAD and modified in Update. Version Update of virt/virtual_machines/importing_vms/virt-importing-rhv-vm.adoc left in tree.
Auto-merging modules/installation-initializing.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/installation-initializing.adoc
Auto-merging installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-default.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-default.adoc
Auto-merging installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-customizations.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-customizations.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Update
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[pneedle-rh]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@pneedle-rh: new pull request created: #26109

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.5

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[pneedle-rh]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@pneedle-rh: #25821 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.6":

Applying: Update
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-customizations.adoc
M	installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-default.adoc
M	modules/installation-initializing.adoc
M	virt/virtual_machines/importing_vms/virt-importing-rhv-vm.adoc
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging virt/virtual_machines/importing_vms/virt-importing-rhv-vm.adoc
Auto-merging modules/installation-initializing.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in modules/installation-initializing.adoc
Auto-merging installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-default.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-default.adoc
Auto-merging installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-customizations.adoc
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in installing/installing_rhv/installing-rhv-customizations.adoc
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
Patch failed at 0001 Update
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[pneedle-rh]

@rolfedh I have merged this PR to master and the openshift-cherrypick-robot successfully created a CP PR for 4.5, which I have just merged. However, there were several merge conflicts when trying to cherry pick to 4.4 and 4.6.

• For 4.4, one of the conflicts relates to virt/virtual_machines/importing_vms/virt-importing-rhv-vm.adoc not existing in 4.4 prior to this CP. Does this mean that you need to add the warning to the CNV named equivalent file in 4.4 instead? There were three other conflicts also. I think the manual cherry picks will benefit from your experience, since they are a little involved.

• For 4.6, the merge conflicts look like they relate to this earlier PR. Going by this comment, it seems that the warning introduced by that earlier PR is not intended for 4.6. It was introduced into 4.4 and 4.5, but 4.6. The current PR 4.6 CP is trying to edit that warning although it does not exist in the 4.6 release branch.

Please can you do the following?:

1. Manually cherry pick this current PR for 4.4 and 4.6. For 4.6 I think that requires manually removing that warning from the conflicted files.

2. Create an additional PR that removes the warning from master, to prevent future merge conflicts.

3. @bergerhoffer noticed that this instance of the warning also needs attributes instead of 'OpenShift Container Platform', 'OCP' and 'Red Hat Virtualization (RHV)'. My apologies, I missed this in my review. Can you please apply attributes to that comment in another PR?

Thank you!

[rolfedh]

I'm stuck. @pneedle-rh I don't have privileges to push (cherry picked) changes to enterprise-4.x branches. (Or I just don't know how to do this.) Can you give me some advice or direct me to someone for help?

[pneedle-rh]

I'm stuck. @pneedle-rh I don't have privileges to push (cherry picked) changes to enterprise-4.x branches. (Or I just don't know how to do this.) Can you give me some advice or direct me to someone for help?

@rolfedh thank you for setting up a call. I look forward to discussing this with you later today.

[mburke5678]

@pneedle-rh @rolfedh It appears that Paul's requests in #25821 (comment) never got implemented, is that true? Do you still plan to CP to 4.4 and 4.6?
If so, can you CP to 4.7 also?

I have a PR to remove the second note from the OKD docs (which isn't really needed as the entire topic isn't in OKD).
#25821 (comment)

[rolfedh]

Thanks, Michael. I'll take care of it.

…

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:06 PM Michael Burke ***@***.***> wrote: @pneedle-rh <https://github.com/pneedle-rh> @rolfedh <https://github.com/rolfedh> It appears that Paul's requests in #25821 (comment) <#25821 (comment)> never got implemented, is that true? Do you still plan to CP to 4.4 and 4.6? If so, can you CP to 4.7 also? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#25821 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACVVO5IEBDQKASKS5MDPEDS5L44XANCNFSM4R3S23IQ> .

-- Rolfe Dlugy-Hegwer Senior Technical Writer, US ENG Content Services Red Hat North Carolina <https://www.redhat.com/> [email protected] M: 910-409-8007 IM: rdlugyhe <https://red.ht/sig>To book a meeting with me, click here. <https://calendly.com/rolfe-at-redhat>

[pneedle-rh]

@rolfedh I should imagine that the same merge conflict will arise for 4.7 as was seen for 4.6. As per my earlier comment for 4.6, I think it will be necessary to manually cherry pick for 4.7 (as well as 4.4 and 4.6) and resolve the points that I outlined.

Please let me know if you would like to run through this on a screen share.

[rolfedh]

This customer story has been addressed in 4.7 by #29364