Skip to content

Conversation

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor

@maxwelldb maxwelldb added this to the Future Release milestone Sep 1, 2020
@maxwelldb maxwelldb self-assigned this Sep 1, 2020
@openshift-docs-preview-bot

The preview will be available shortly at:

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pierreprinetti Feel free to skim this. I haven't added anything to assemblies, yet, but each module should stand as a discrete task.

@maxwelldb maxwelldb force-pushed the osp-ironic-osdocs1276 branch from a16a424 to 41f0afc Compare September 11, 2020 17:40
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 11, 2020
@maxwelldb maxwelldb force-pushed the osp-ironic-osdocs1276 branch 2 times, most recently from 504d6dc to 895dee3 Compare September 11, 2020 17:53
@maxwelldb maxwelldb marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2020 18:33
@maxwelldb maxwelldb requested a review from mandre September 18, 2020 14:18
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added @mandre based on upstream docs blame. :)

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Change coming: openshift/installer#4230

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

maxwelldb commented Oct 2, 2020

Updates in progress.

@maxwelldb maxwelldb force-pushed the osp-ironic-osdocs1276 branch from 666a75f to 33893d9 Compare October 2, 2020 18:22
@maxwelldb maxwelldb requested a review from mandre October 6, 2020 15:18
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Hold on, I just noticed something.

Comment on lines 43 to 44
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These two modules aren't specific to UPI, they're also relevant to IPI with custom subnet.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This module also applies to UPI.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mandre Just woke up, but does that mean that the "installer-provisioned network" description would need to go, then?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mandre And is the example YAML in it appropriate for both IPI and UPI?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, the flavors set in the install-config.yaml files aren't used in UPI. We need to modify the os_flavor_master and os_flavor_worker ansible variables in the inventory.yaml file in the UPI case.

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mandre See be98086

Previews should rebuild shortly.

@maxwelldb maxwelldb requested a review from mandre October 7, 2020 14:21
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Removing 4.6 label. Will be included in TBD release.

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 19, 2020
@maxwelldb maxwelldb added branch/enterprise-4.7 and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Dec 17, 2020
@maxwelldb maxwelldb requested a review from udis January 16, 2021 13:36
@udis
Copy link

udis commented Feb 1, 2021

@maxwelldb Looks good. I would add a note about FIP and FIPless options which can have an effect on the install-config.yaml example.

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@udis Do you have something more concrete that you'd like to see there? This has been low-touch for me since October, of course. :)

Copy link

@udis udis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FIP vs FIPless note based on openstack baremetal network

@maxwelldb maxwelldb removed the request for review from morenod February 4, 2021 16:15
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 4, 2021

Deploy preview for osdocs ready!

Built with commit 2a9d8c6

https://deploy-preview-25167--osdocs.netlify.app

@maxwelldb maxwelldb added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Feb 8, 2021
@maxwelldb maxwelldb requested a review from jboxman February 8, 2021 20:31
Copy link
Contributor

@jboxman jboxman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some comments for your review. Thanks!

@jboxman jboxman added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Feb 9, 2021
@maxwelldb maxwelldb force-pushed the osp-ironic-osdocs1276 branch from 361b5c8 to 8e7eb46 Compare February 10, 2021 18:34
@maxwelldb maxwelldb force-pushed the osp-ironic-osdocs1276 branch from 8e7eb46 to 2a9d8c6 Compare February 10, 2021 18:39
@maxwelldb maxwelldb merged commit c120fd1 into openshift:master Feb 10, 2021
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.7

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@maxwelldb: new pull request created: #29377

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.7

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.7 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants