Skip to content

Conversation

@rh-max
Copy link
Contributor

@rh-max rh-max commented Sep 11, 2019

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 11, 2019
@rh-max
Copy link
Contributor Author

rh-max commented Sep 18, 2019

@ahardin-rh Hi, could you please review this?
(to be merged to enterprise-4.2)

@rh-max rh-max force-pushed the monitoring-tolerations branch from 2ad5f18 to b796958 Compare September 18, 2019 18:06
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/Make sure/Ensure

@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR branch/enterprise-4.2 labels Sep 18, 2019
@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh added this to the Future Release milestone Sep 18, 2019
@ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@rh-max Just one minor comment from me. 👍 Once you submit a fix, please squash all commits into one and I will merge and cherry-pick. 🚀

Try to fix an internal reference

Change the toleration example to a less confusing one

Try to fix an xref
@rh-max rh-max force-pushed the monitoring-tolerations branch from cfb2a98 to e7c62a8 Compare September 18, 2019 19:26
@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh merged commit e732b87 into openshift:master Sep 18, 2019
@rh-max
Copy link
Contributor Author

rh-max commented Sep 18, 2019

@ahardin-rh Let me reject the suggestion, I use "Make sure" consistently throughout monitoring and changing it to "Ensure" everywhere wouldn't work from the grammar standpoint in some cases. And they mean the same thing, although "Ensure" is more formal.
Squashed. Thanks!

@ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@rh-max Works for me. Thanks!

@rh-max
Copy link
Contributor Author

rh-max commented Sep 18, 2019

@ahardin-rh You merged before I finish the comment :) Let me know if you insist on the ^ suggestion.

@ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick enterprise-4.2

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@ahardin-rh: new pull request created: #16745

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rh-max
Copy link
Contributor Author

rh-max commented Sep 18, 2019

@ahardin-rh Great!

+
Substitute `<component>` and `<toleration specification>` accordingly.
+
For example, a `kubectl taint nodes node1 key1=value1:NoSchedule` taint prevents the scheduler from placing pods in `foo: bar`. To make the `alertmanagerMain` component ignore that taint and to place `alertmanagerMain` in `foo: bar` normally, use this toleration:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kubectl taint nodes node1 key1=value1:NoSchedule
=>
oc adm taint nodes node1 key1=value1:NoSchedule

prevents the scheduler from placing pods in foo: bar
=>
prevents the scheduler from placing pods in foo: bar node

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Implemented in #16978.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.2 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants