-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
modules/machineset-*: Drop openshiftClusterID #13987
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
modules/machineset-*: Drop openshiftClusterID #13987
Conversation
The installer no longer sets this since openshift/installer@56f47611 (data/aws: use cluster_id to name all resources, 2019-02-19, openshift/installer#1280).
|
Thanks @wking! @sunzhaohua2, will you PTAL? |
|
Spun off from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685089 |
|
@sunzhaohua2, will you PTAL? |
2 similar comments
|
@sunzhaohua2, will you PTAL? |
|
@sunzhaohua2, will you PTAL? |
|
@jianlinliu, will you PTAL? I know that @sunzhaohua2 owns the machine stuff, but this is related to |
|
I do not think this is related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685089#c11, in 1685089, the reproduce steps are really clean and simple. There is no any intervention with machineset stuff. Do I miss something? |
Adjusting the MachineSet, like I'm doing here, catches these docs up with this installer change. The registry's S3 tagging is completely separate, and I'm working up a PR to fix their tagging while porting them off cluster-config-v1, but the PR isn't filed yet. Still, I don't see any need to hold this PR based on the registry's tagging, MachineSets are orthogonal. |
|
Now for machineset, LGTM. |
|
Then I'm going to merge this one. @wking, let me know if the registry change has a doc impact, too. Thanks! |
The installer no longer sets this since openshift/installer@56f47611 (openshift/installer#1280).