-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
ROX-30773: Release notes for 4.9 #100158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ROX-30773: Release notes for 4.9 #100158
Conversation
|
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-30773 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
🤖 Mon Oct 27 19:23:15 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
90a2156 to
cba2d1a
Compare
5fb3ec8 to
ded2d58
Compare
|
@kcarmichael08: This pull request references ROX-30773 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
2f6af43 to
52698af
Compare
mclasmeier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMHO we need more in the release notes about the new admission controller config stuff.
Also, in the "deprecated features" section we list a couple of roxctl options, but we are not listing the now newly deprecated Helm chart and SecuredCluster CR fields.
d4f78b5 to
2e4eb45
Compare
2e4eb45 to
0185a13
Compare
376e15f to
bd997ba
Compare
|
Aren't these two separate topics? Like, we have the new failure policy stuff on the one hand and the new configuration style for enforcement on the other hand?
I don't really see it so that the second bullet point belongs to "Admission controller failure setting enhancements". @clickboo |
Agree. The title can be changed to Admission Controller Configuration Enhancements and it would be fine. |
5ee0121 to
0541ef1
Compare
0541ef1 to
f500bfc
Compare
f500bfc to
07d8888
Compare
07d8888 to
6e8926d
Compare
6e8926d to
a4b721e
Compare
|
@kcarmichael08: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/cherrypick rhacs-docs-4.9 |
|
@kcarmichael08: #100158 failed to apply on top of branch "rhacs-docs-4.9": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |

Version(s): 4.9
Issue
Link to docs preview
QE review: ACS has no QE, approved by SMEs
Additional information: