Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for OpenShift SDN Check #4126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 12, 2017
Merged

Conversation

VincentS
Copy link
Contributor

@VincentS VincentS commented May 9, 2017

The variable used in the conditional was wrong and had to be changed to be working as intended.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?
I understand the following commands:

  • bot, add author to whitelist
  • bot, test pull request
  • bot, test pull request once

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?
I understand the following commands:

  • bot, add author to whitelist
  • bot, test pull request
  • bot, test pull request once

@@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ os_firewall_allow:
port: 443/tcp
- service: OpenShift OVS sdn
port: 4789/udp
when: openshift.node.use_openshift_sdn | bool
when: openshift.common.use_openshift_sdn | bool
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

openshift-ansible]$ grep -rn "node.use_openshift_sdn"
roles/openshift_node/defaults/main.yml:11:  when: openshift.node.use_openshift_sdn | bool
openshift-ansible]$ grep -rn "common.use_openshift_sdn" | wc -l
20
roles/openshift_facts/library/openshift_facts.py:992:        use_sdn = facts['common']['use_openshift_sdn']
roles/openshift_facts/library/openshift_facts.py:995:            facts['common']['use_openshift_sdn'] = use_sdn
roles/openshift_facts/library/openshift_facts.py:2026:        defaults['common'] = dict(use_openshift_sdn=True, ip=ip_addr,

This is indeed a bug. Wondering why it popped up now, not much more sooner.

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

aos-ci-test

@openshift-bot
Copy link

success: "aos-ci-jenkins/OS_3.5_NOT_containerized, aos-ci-jenkins/OS_3.5_NOT_containerized_e2e_tests" for 0bafbb0 (logs)

@openshift-bot
Copy link

success: "aos-ci-jenkins/OS_3.6_NOT_containerized, aos-ci-jenkins/OS_3.6_NOT_containerized_e2e_tests" for 0bafbb0 (logs)

@openshift-bot
Copy link

success: "aos-ci-jenkins/OS_3.6_containerized, aos-ci-jenkins/OS_3.6_containerized_e2e_tests" for 0bafbb0 (logs)

@openshift-bot
Copy link

success: "aos-ci-jenkins/OS_3.5_containerized, aos-ci-jenkins/OS_3.5_containerized_e2e_tests" for 0bafbb0 (logs)

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Evaluated for openshift ansible merge up to 0bafbb0

@openshift-bot
Copy link

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge FAILURE (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_request_openshift_ansible/364/) (Base Commit: 593ef65)

@ingvagabund ingvagabund merged commit d1d60e2 into openshift:master May 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants