-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Allow composite commands to be overridden #4043
feat: Allow composite commands to be overridden #4043
Conversation
Adds support for overriding composite commands in parent devfiles. Also fixes a bug where parent commands could not be overridden if the parent command contained upper case letters. Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
/retest |
Signed-off-by: John Collier <[email protected]>
@mik-dass Thanks for reviewing, fixed the typos! The "o" key on my laptop has been acting up lately 😅 |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4043 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 43.28% 43.31% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 147 147
Lines 12435 12452 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 5383 5394 +11
- Misses 6483 6486 +3
- Partials 569 572 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mik-dass The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code LGTM!
/lgtm
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
re-adding |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/area devfile
What does does this PR do / why we need it:
Adds support for overriding composite commands in parent devfiles. Also fixes a bug where parent commands could not be overridden if the parent command contained upper case letters.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3759
PR acceptance criteria:
Unit test
Integration test
Documentation
I have read the test guidelines
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer:
Sample devfile:
Output should have: