Skip to content

Conversation

@jmrodri
Copy link
Contributor

@jmrodri jmrodri commented Dec 16, 2020

Combining PRs #76, #77, #80, #81, #83 since they are based on really old
branches with failing tests.

…t with ART

Combining PRs #76, #77, #80, #81, #83 since they are based on really old
branches with failing tests.
Copy link
Contributor

@estroz estroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: estroz, jmrodri

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 220f670 into openshift:master Dec 16, 2020
@jmrodri jmrodri deleted the art-consistency-openshift-4.7 branch February 13, 2021 17:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants