-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 461
OCPBUGS-57423: pkg/operator/status: Drop PoolUpdating as an Upgradeable=False condition #5119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-57423: pkg/operator/status: Drop PoolUpdating as an Upgradeable=False condition #5119
Conversation
956e787 (Implement Upgrade-Monitor, FeatureGate, and MachineConfigNode types, 2023-11-28, openshift#4012) had added the "this should no longer trigger when adding a node to a pool" comment, but unfortunately, it's still triggering. For example, in [1]: $ curl -s https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-serial-crun/1868424902256627712/build-log.txt | grep 'PoolUpdating' | sort | uniq time="2024-12-16T01:43:52Z" level=info msg="operator status: processing event" event="Dec 16 00:55:35.662 W clusteroperator/machine-config condition/Upgradeable reason/PoolUpdating status/False One or more machine config pools are updating, please see `oc get mcp` for further details" operator=machine-config Checking PromeCIeus, the Upgradeable=False window seems to have been 00:56 through 00:59, which correlates with the scale-up/scale-down of the serial suite: $ curl -s https://storage.googleapis.com/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-serial-crun/1868424902256627712/build-log.txt | grep 'Managed cluster should grow and decrease when scaling different machineSets simultaneously' started: 0/20/74 "[sig-cluster-lifecycle][Feature:Machines][Serial] Managed cluster should grow and decrease when scaling different machineSets simultaneously [Timeout:30m][apigroup:machine.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" passed: (5m42s) 2024-12-16T00:57:49 "[sig-cluster-lifecycle][Feature:Machines][Serial] Managed cluster should grow and decrease when scaling different machineSets simultaneously [Timeout:30m][apigroup:machine.openshift.io] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial]" confirmed via MCC logs: $ curl -s https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-serial-crun/1868424902256627712/artifacts/e2e-gcp-ovn-serial-crun/gather-extra/artifacts/pods/openshift-machine-config-operator_machine-config-controller-6f4f46457c-v8b2l_machine-config-controller.log | grep rendered- I1216 00:55:35.430231 1 node_controller.go:584] Pool worker[zone=us-central1-f]: node ci-op-k8c03v6z-9149a-r27w7-worker-f-t7rmb: changed annotation machineconfiguration.openshift.io/currentConfig = rendered-worker-6d0e61dc44f24db3272625b901024ed2 I1216 00:55:35.430252 1 node_controller.go:584] Pool worker[zone=us-central1-f]: node ci-op-k8c03v6z-9149a-r27w7-worker-f-t7rmb: changed annotation machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredConfig = rendered-worker-6d0e61dc44f24db3272625b901024ed2 I1216 00:55:36.174629 1 node_controller.go:584] Pool worker[zone=us-central1-a]: node ci-op-k8c03v6z-9149a-r27w7-worker-a-f7hkj: changed annotation machineconfiguration.openshift.io/currentConfig = rendered-worker-6d0e61dc44f24db3272625b901024ed2 I1216 00:55:36.174738 1 node_controller.go:584] Pool worker[zone=us-central1-a]: node ci-op-k8c03v6z-9149a-r27w7-worker-a-f7hkj: changed annotation machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredConfig = rendered-worker-6d0e61dc44f24db3272625b901024ed2 I1216 00:55:41.296273 1 node_controller.go:584] Pool worker[zone=us-central1-b]: node ci-op-k8c03v6z-9149a-r27w7-worker-b-554bt: changed annotation machineconfiguration.openshift.io/currentConfig = rendered-worker-6d0e61dc44f24db3272625b901024ed2 I1216 00:55:41.296306 1 node_controller.go:584] Pool worker[zone=us-central1-b]: node ci-op-k8c03v6z-9149a-r27w7-worker-b-554bt: changed annotation machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredConfig = rendered-worker-6d0e61dc44f24db3272625b901024ed2 I1216 00:55:47.106173 1 node_controller.go:584] Pool worker[zone=us-central1-c]: node ci-op-k8c03v6z-9149a-r27w7-worker-c-hshj2: changed annotation machineconfiguration.openshift.io/currentConfig = rendered-worker-6d0e61dc44f24db3272625b901024ed2 I1216 00:55:47.106201 1 node_controller.go:584] Pool worker[zone=us-central1-c]: node ci-op-k8c03v6z-9149a-r27w7-worker-c-hshj2: changed annotation machineconfiguration.openshift.io/desiredConfig = rendered-worker-6d0e61dc44f24db3272625b901024ed2 In this commit, I'm dropping the code that had been moving the ClusterOperator to Upgradeable=False on PoolUpdating entirely, instead of hoping that it doesn't trip. I haven't dug into why the code had still been tripping. But we want to stay Upgradeable=True while new nodes scale in, because clusters where nodes are joining should still be able to update to 4.(y+1). There are node-vs.-control-plane skew issues that should block updates to 4.(y+1), but they're enforced by the Kube API server operator [2], and don't need the MCO chipping in. [1]: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-serial-crun/1868424902256627712 [2]: openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator@9ce4f74
|
/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-57135 |
|
@wking: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57135 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57423. Will retitle bug to link to clone. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57423, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
unit /retest-required |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
pre-merge verified using IPI on AWS
No issues found /label qe-approved |
|
@wking: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57423, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
yuqi-zhang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/backport-risk-assessed
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wking, yuqi-zhang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest-required |
|
@wking: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/verified by @sergiordlr Applying the verified label per Sergio's verification in #5119 (comment). |
|
@isabella-janssen: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed Looks like a clean backport that has been verified and approved by the team. |
|
/retest-required |
f508597
into
openshift:release-4.16
|
@wking: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57423 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57423 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2025-10-25-135048 |
Manually picking #4760 / #5111 back to 4.16, which is using
coStatusinstead ofcoStatusCondition, because it lacks #4321. Otherwise identical: