Skip to content

Conversation

@runcom
Copy link
Member

@runcom runcom commented Feb 15, 2019

- What I did

builds on top of #363, cause I don't want to block that from merging right now, if you guys want instead, I'll close this and, assuming this is needed we'll modify #363 directly.

@cgwalters ptal I'm not entirely sure we need this but I saw the ssh MCs were missing the osimageurl so I've added it (check only last commit)

- How I did it

vim

- How to verify it

test this PR with a custom payload and verify the -ssh MCs do have the osimageurl populated as well

- Description for the changelog

cgwalters and others added 3 commits February 13, 2019 14:41
This reverts commit 3808104 - it
didn't work and actively breaks things actually because we no
long substitute the value at build time.
This injects the `OSImageURL` into the "base"
config (e.g. `00-worker`, `00-master`).  This differs from
previous pull requests which made it a separate MC, but that
adds visual noise and will exacerbate renderer race conditions.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 15, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

This isn't necessary and IMO will just add confusion.

See #228 for some history around this.

If I could go back in time I think we should have made machineconfigsrendered a distinct object namespace. It's fairly confusing how we mix our own data along with users' data. And in particular with how osimageurl is handed.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: runcom

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 15, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Specifically see #279

@runcom
Copy link
Member Author

runcom commented Feb 15, 2019

makes total sense, closing, thanks for looking

@runcom runcom closed this Feb 15, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws 0447955 link /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants