OCPBUGS-197: daemon: Add a workaround for bug 2111817 #3292

sinnykumari · 2022-08-17T10:28:55Z

systemd's implementation of InaccessiblePaths has
quadratic behavior in number of mounts.
The fix to rpm-ostree is inbound. But...adding this workaround which
has the MCD dynamically reconfigure the system to drop that config will
help unstick clusters so they can get the real fix.

Manual backport of PR #329

systemd's implementation of `InaccessiblePaths` has quadratic behavior in number of mounts. The fix to rpm-ostree is inbound. But...adding this workaround which has the MCD dynamically reconfigure the system to drop that config will help unstick clusters so they can get the real fix. Manual backport of PR openshift#329

openshift-ci · 2022-08-17T10:28:58Z

@sinnykumari: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

daemon: Add a workaround for bug 2111817

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2022-08-17T10:33:46Z

@sinnykumari: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

OCPBUGS-197: daemon: Add a workaround for bug 2111817

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-17T10:33:48Z

@sinnykumari: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.11.0" version, but it targets "4.11.z" instead
expected [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197) to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.12.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

systemd's implementation of InaccessiblePaths has
quadratic behavior in number of mounts.
The fix to rpm-ostree is inbound. But...adding this workaround which
has the MCD dynamically reconfigure the system to drop that config will
help unstick clusters so they can get the real fix.

Manual backport of PR #329

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sinnykumari · 2022-08-17T11:55:33Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2022-08-17T11:55:36Z

@sinnykumari: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sinnykumari · 2022-08-17T11:56:05Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-17T11:56:08Z

@sinnykumari: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.11.0" version, but it targets "4.11.z" instead
expected [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197) to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.12.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sdodson · 2022-08-17T13:30:40Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-17T13:30:42Z

@sdodson: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.11.0" version, but it targets "4.11.z" instead
expected [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197) to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.12.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sdodson · 2022-08-17T13:31:29Z

/jira refresh
Just trying to figure out what field the bot uses for

expected the bug to target the "4.11.0" version, but it targets "4.11.z" instead

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-17T13:31:33Z

@sdodson: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.11.0" version, but it targets "4.11.z" instead
expected [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197) to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.12.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh
Just trying to figure out what field the bot uses for

expected the bug to target the "4.11.0" version, but it targets "4.11.z" instead

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sinnykumari · 2022-08-17T13:42:06Z

Fixed depends on, retrying
/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-17T13:42:09Z

@sinnykumari: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.11.0" version, but it targets "4.11.z" instead
expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGSM-47294 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is QE Review instead
expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGSM-47294 to target a version in 4.12.0, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Fixed depends on, retrying
/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sdodson · 2022-08-17T13:43:47Z

@sinnykumari I think the jira bug validation rules aren't correct, I'll follow up with w/ DPTP on that if you can work on getting QE to test the 4.12 bug in the mean time.

openshift-ci · 2022-08-17T13:45:41Z

@sinnykumari: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade-single-node	`aef55a4`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-upgrade-single-node`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive	`aef55a4`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-disruptive`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node	`aef55a4`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-single-node`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

sinnykumari · 2022-08-17T13:49:09Z

@sinnykumari I think the jira bug validation rules aren't correct, I'll follow up with w/ DPTP on that if you can work on getting QE to test the 4.12 bug in the mean time.

Yeah, working on it!

sinnykumari · 2022-08-17T13:58:21Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-17T13:58:27Z

@sinnykumari: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGSM-47294 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is QE Review instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sdodson · 2022-08-17T16:27:56Z

openshift/release#31412 will fix the jira config up

sdodson · 2022-08-17T17:25:33Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-17T17:25:35Z

@sdodson: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGSM-47294 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is QE Review instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

cgwalters · 2022-08-17T19:43:12Z

/label backport-risk-assessed

openshift-ci · 2022-08-17T19:43:21Z

@cgwalters: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers]

Details

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

yuqi-zhang · 2022-08-17T22:56:52Z

Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers]

Is that... new?

/label backport-risk-assessed

yuqi-zhang

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2022-08-17T22:58:06Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sinnykumari, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [sinnykumari,yuqi-zhang]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

sinnykumari · 2022-08-18T08:40:59Z

Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers]

Is that... new?

/label backport-risk-assessed

That's because Colin wasn't added in the list. Should be now with openshift/release#31449 merged.

sinnykumari · 2022-08-18T12:54:55Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-18T12:54:57Z

@sinnykumari: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGSM-47294 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is Done (Done) instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sinnykumari · 2022-08-18T13:01:39Z

fun, this PR is seeing edges of both bugzilla and Jira world

sinnykumari · 2022-08-18T13:12:44Z

/assign @rioliu-rh

sdodson · 2022-08-18T13:17:50Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-18T13:17:52Z

@sdodson: This pull request references [Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197), which is invalid:

expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGSM-47294 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is Done (Done) instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-08-18T13:23:49Z

@sinnykumari: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

openshift/machine-config-operator#3292

[Jira Issue OCPBUGS-197](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-197) has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

systemd's implementation of InaccessiblePaths has
quadratic behavior in number of mounts.
The fix to rpm-ostree is inbound. But...adding this workaround which
has the MCD dynamically reconfigure the system to drop that config will
help unstick clusters so they can get the real fix.

Manual backport of PR #329

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci bot requested review from cheesesashimi and kikisdeliveryservice August 17, 2022 10:29

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 17, 2022

sinnykumari changed the title ~~daemon: Add a workaround for bug 2111817~~ OCPBUGS-197: daemon: Add a workaround for bug 2111817 Aug 17, 2022

openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 17, 2022

sinnykumari requested review from cgwalters and removed request for kikisdeliveryservice August 17, 2022 10:33

sinnykumari mentioned this pull request Aug 17, 2022

Bug 2111817: daemon: Add a workaround for bug 2111817 #3291

Merged

openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 17, 2022

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 17, 2022

openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Aug 17, 2022

yuqi-zhang approved these changes Aug 17, 2022

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot assigned yuqi-zhang Aug 17, 2022

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 17, 2022

openshift-ci bot assigned rioliu-rh Aug 18, 2022

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 54a105e into openshift:release-4.11 Aug 18, 2022

OCPBUGS-197: daemon: Add a workaround for bug 2111817 #3292

OCPBUGS-197: daemon: Add a workaround for bug 2111817 #3292

Uh oh!

Conversation

sinnykumari commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cgwalters commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

yuqi-zhang commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

yuqi-zhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2022

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 18, 2022

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 18, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 18, 2022 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 18, 2022

Uh oh!

sinnykumari commented Aug 18, 2022

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Aug 18, 2022

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

sdodson commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 17, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 18, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 18, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 18, 2022 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading