daemon: don't use type name as variable name #310
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This confused me while grepping through the codebase. We were naming a variable the same as its type. Compiled fine but shadowing it might have caused issues in the future.
openshift-ci-robot
added
size/S
Member
|
/lgtm |
Contributor
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, jlebon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ashcrow
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2019
osherdp
pushed a commit
to osherdp/machine-config-operator
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2021
Update OKD contents sync script
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This confused me while grepping through the codebase. We were naming a
variable the same as its type. Compiled fine but shadowing it might have
caused issues in the future.