Skip to content

Conversation

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

@sjenning sjenning commented Dec 7, 2018

One in a series of PRs to set memory requests for all control plane and high memory use components.

We are encountering master instability (openshift/installer#408 openshift/installer#785) as the number of components increase because many components run BestEffort giving the scheduler no information on pod resource usage.

Looking at prometheus metrics, the etcd-member pod has a min usage of ~200Mi at cluster start, grows to ~600Mi before GCing and dropping to ~400Mi.

Because it is a control plane component, I'm giving it a buffer and setting to max at 600Mi

@abhinavdahiya @derekwaynecarr

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 7, 2018
@sjenning sjenning force-pushed the add-etcd-memory-request branch from 6ec9348 to c5e63a9 Compare December 7, 2018 16:54
@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor Author

sjenning commented Dec 7, 2018

/retest

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 7, 2018
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 7, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, sjenning

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9a8ba60 into openshift:master Dec 7, 2018
osherdp pushed a commit to osherdp/machine-config-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2021
…ogressing

Bug 1782683: no longer gate removed processing when imagestreams in progress
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants