Skip to content

Conversation

@russellb
Copy link
Contributor

This came up because of a bug report showing that workloads were
scheduled on masters for the baremetal platform regardless of the
schedulableMasters scheduler configuration. This is due to the
NoSchedule taint not being applied by default on this platform. The
baremetal platform specific kubelet caused this behavior. We were
going to remove the custom kubelet config once this behavior was
configurable (see PR #993), but it was never removed because we ended
up needing to make some IPv6 related customizations in this file. We
also forgot to re-add the default taint.

Meanwhile, some other changes to the kubelet unit were not applied to
the baremetal version.

This is the simplest fix, which is to get these files in sync again.
The differences are very minor, so a better follow-up would be to get
back to a single kubelet unit, or at least share the duplicated
content somehow.

I'm leaving that further cleanup as another change, since the most
straight forward fix will be the simpler one to backport.

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828250

master: #1817
4.5: #1835

This came up because of a bug report showing that workloads were
scheduled on masters for the baremetal platform regardless of the
schedulableMasters scheduler configuration. This is due to the
NoSchedule taint not being applied by default on this platform. The
baremetal platform specific kubelet caused this behavior. We were
going to remove the custom kubelet config once this behavior was
configurable (see PR openshift#993), but it was never removed because we ended
up needing to make some IPv6 related customizations in this file. We
also forgot to re-add the default taint.

Meanwhile, some other changes to the kubelet unit were not applied to
the baremetal version.

This is the simplest fix, which is to get these files in sync again.
The differences are very minor, so a better follow-up would be to get
back to a single kubelet unit, or at least share the duplicated
content somehow.

I'm leaving that further cleanup as another change, since the most
straight forward fix will be the simpler one to backport.

Fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828250
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Sync kublelet config across platforms

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@russellb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retitle Bug 1849217: Sync kublelet config across platforms

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title Sync kublelet config across platforms Bug 1849217: Sync kublelet config across platforms Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 19, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1849217, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1828250 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1846503 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1828250 to target a release in 4.5.0, 4.5.z, but it targets "4.6.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1849217: Sync kublelet config across platforms

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 19, 2020
@russellb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1849217, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1846503 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jun 25, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@runcom: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1849217, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1846503 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1846503 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
  • bug has dependents
Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@runcom
Copy link
Member

runcom commented Jun 25, 2020

cc @rphillips

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 25, 2020
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Jul 7, 2020

/test e2e-metal-ipi

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

stbenjam commented Jul 7, 2020

I'd prefer to see this pass e2e-metal-ipi before merging, but it does look fine to me.

@hardys
Copy link

hardys commented Jul 8, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hardys, runcom, russellb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jul 8, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 530c497 into openshift:release-4.4 Jul 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/machine-config-operator#1852. Bugzilla bug 1849217 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1849217: Sync kublelet config across platforms

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants