Skip to content

Bug 1968520: update to k8s 1.21.2#819

Closed
soltysh wants to merge 76 commits intoopenshift:release-4.8from
soltysh:rebase-1.21.2
Closed

Bug 1968520: update to k8s 1.21.2#819
soltysh wants to merge 76 commits intoopenshift:release-4.8from
soltysh:rebase-1.21.2

Conversation

@soltysh
Copy link

@soltysh soltysh commented Jun 21, 2021

/assign @sttts

Only and expected problems were caused by #761.
You can verify the conflicts in UPSTREAM: <drop>: manually resolve conflicts in go.mod and go.sum files commit.
All the rest was clean.

wzshiming and others added 30 commits May 8, 2021 00:02
This installer image should be compatible with COS-M85 images,
specifically `cos-85-13310-1041-9`
A recent refactoring of these tests to use common pod functions requires that the StorageClassTest's Client be set.
This updates the "Invalid AWS KMS key" test to set its Client similar to other tests in the file.
…ck-of-#101950-upstream-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#101950: Make watch order conformance test reliable
…-pick-of-#101737-upstream-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#101737: Use CSI driver to determine unique name for migrated in-tree
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
dbus 5.0.4 adds StoreProperty method which needs to be implemented for
the mock.

Fixes the errors like

> pkg/kubelet/nodeshutdown/systemd/inhibit_linux_test.go:88:9: cannot use f.fakeDBusObject (variable of type *fakeDBusObject) as dbus.BusObject value in return statement: missing method StoreProperty

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
…ick-of-#101358-upstream-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#101358: Ref counting is only applicable to Remote endpoints
runc rc95 contains a fix for CVE-2021-30465.

runc rc94 provides fixes and improvements.

One notable change is cgroup manager's Set now accept Resources rather
than Cgroup (see opencontainers/runc#2906).
Modify the code accordingly.

Also update runc dependencies (as hinted by hack/lint-depdendencies.sh):

        github.com/cilium/ebpf v0.5.0
        github.com/containerd/console v1.0.2
        github.com/coreos/go-systemd/v22 v22.3.1
        github.com/godbus/dbus/v5 v5.0.4
        github.com/moby/sys/mountinfo v0.4.1
        golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20210426230700-d19ff857e887
        github.com/google/go-cmp v0.5.4
        github.com/kr/pretty v0.2.1
        github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec v1.0.3-0.20210326190908-1c3f411f0417

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
This sets cgroup config via libcontainer to make sure we apply the
correct values to the systemd slices and scopes.

Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
…pick-of-#102147-upstream-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#102147: vendor: bump runc to rc95
…ck-of-#102224-upstream-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#102224: Fix expired unit test certs
To support CSA and SSA interoperability, SSA updates the CSA
last-applied annotation.

This change ensures we don't set a big last-applied annotation if the
value is over the annotation limits.

Also, make sure that it's possible to opt-out of this behavior by
setting the CSA annotation to "" the empty string.
…erry-pick-of-#102105-upstream-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#102105: Respect annotation size limit for SSA last-applied.
The v0.0.19 Konnectivity client includes several
significant fixes to prevent the GRPC tunnel between
the KAS and the APIServer Network Proxy from becoming
blocked/wedged.
Importantly it picks up the fix for kubernetes-sigs/apiserver-network-proxy#167.
We believe this will also fix many of the failures currently seen on
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-api-machinery-network-proxy#ci-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-network-proxy-grpc&width=5.
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2021

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1968520, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1968520 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

10 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2021

@soltysh: PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 2, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 2, 2021

@soltysh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/verify-commits b2a900b link /test verify-commits
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node b2a900b link /test e2e-aws-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-gcp b2a900b link /test e2e-gcp

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ehashman
Copy link

Note: kubernetes#102676 was introduced in 1.21.2, we may want to wait for the fix in 1.21.3.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 22, 2021

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2021

@sdodson: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1968520, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 1968520 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh
Copy link
Author

soltysh commented Aug 17, 2021

Replaced with #888

@soltysh soltysh closed this Aug 17, 2021
@soltysh soltysh deleted the rebase-1.21.2 branch August 17, 2021 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.