OCPBUGS-61381: Enable DRA related tests from OCP-4.21 #2482

sairameshv · 2025-10-01T08:19:12Z

DRA has been graduated to GA in pstream from K8s-1.34
DynamicResourceAllocation featuregate is enabled for TPNU cluster types in Openshift
Hence, the tests need to be enabled to get some signal so that the featuregate can be enabled for the Default cluster types as well
Also, disabled the tests that run based out of DRA's beta API as we don't enable the beta APIs downstream and only depend on the GA'ed APIs

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Enables the DRA related tests to be run for all the techpreview jobs

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

This is to get some signal from sippy so that the featuregate can be removed/enable for the all/default cluster types

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

"NONE"

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-01T08:19:18Z

@sairameshv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61381, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lyman9966

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

DRA has been graduated to GA in pstream from K8s-1.34

DynamicResourceAllocation featuregate is enabled for TPNU cluster types in Openshift

Hence, the tests need to be enabled to get some signal so that the featuregate can be enabled for the Default cluster types as well

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Enables the DRA related tests to be run for all the techpreview jobs

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

This is to get some signal from sippy so that the featuregate can be removed/enable for the all/default cluster types

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
"NONE"
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-01T08:19:23Z

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

5385fe7|OCPBUGS-61381: Enable DRA related tests from OCP-4.21: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

openshift-ci · 2025-10-01T08:20:51Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sairameshv
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bertinatto for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

sairameshv · 2025-10-01T08:21:50Z

I would like to monitor the TP enabled jobs i.e. ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview, ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial to look out for the DRA related e2e tests

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-08T07:36:16Z

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

b2b1181|UPSTREAM: : Enable tests from DynamicResourceAllocation featuregate: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
d35f108|UPSTREAM: : Disable tests of DynamicResourceAllocation beta API: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-08T07:38:20Z

@sairameshv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61381, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.21.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.21.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lyman9966

In response to this:

DRA has been graduated to GA in pstream from K8s-1.34

DynamicResourceAllocation featuregate is enabled for TPNU cluster types in Openshift

Hence, the tests need to be enabled to get some signal so that the featuregate can be enabled for the Default cluster types as well

Also, disabled the tests that run based out of DRA's beta API as we don't enable the beta APIs downstream and only depend on the GA'ed APIs

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Enables the DRA related tests to be run for all the techpreview jobs

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

This is to get some signal from sippy so that the featuregate can be removed/enable for the all/default cluster types

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
"NONE"
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-08T13:31:55Z

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

5fe5276|UPSTREAM: : Enable tests from DynamicResourceAllocation featuregate: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

sairameshv · 2025-10-08T13:32:33Z

/cc @tkashem

…gate - Fixes OCPBUGS-61381, enables DRA related tests from OCP-4.21 - DRA has been graduated to GA in upstream from K8s-1.34 i.e OCP-4.21 - These tests need to be enabled to get some signal so that the featuregate can be enabled for the Default cluster types in o/api - Disabling the tests that run on the DRA beta APIs as we support the GA APIs only Signed-off-by: Sai Ramesh Vanka <[email protected]>

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-08T14:41:14Z

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

c348e5d|UPSTREAM: : Enable tests from DynamicResourceAllocation featuregate: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

sairameshv · 2025-10-08T14:41:55Z

openshift-hack/cmd/k8s-tests-ext/disabled_tests.go

 			"[sig-node] ImageCredentialProvider [Feature:KubeletCredentialProviders] should be able to create pod with image credentials fetched from external credential provider",
 		},
+		// tests for beta APIs that are not enabled
+		"DisabledResourceBetaAPI": {


Hello @jacobsee , @bertinatto
I know you have been working on the rebase and so the disabling of DRA beta related tests from your commit of the 1.34 rebase PR

Do you think this change of keeping the beta tests under a separate key "DisabledResourceBetaAPI" makes sense? If so, do you want to pick this commit as part of the rebase PR?

openshift-ci · 2025-10-08T19:44:58Z

@sairameshv: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi	`5385fe7`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-csi`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial	`5385fe7`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview	`5385fe7`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-crun-wasm	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-crun-wasm`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-fips`
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-runc	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-runc`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-gcp`
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-conformance-aws	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test k8s-e2e-conformance-aws`
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn	`c348e5d`	link	false	`/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn`
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-crun	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-crun`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-serial`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift	`c348e5d`	link	true	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

sairameshv · 2025-10-09T07:52:12Z

Closing the PR as this is already addressed as part of the 1.34 rebase PR's commit

openshift-ci-robot · 2025-10-09T07:52:18Z

@sairameshv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-61381. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

DRA has been graduated to GA in pstream from K8s-1.34

DynamicResourceAllocation featuregate is enabled for TPNU cluster types in Openshift

Hence, the tests need to be enabled to get some signal so that the featuregate can be enabled for the Default cluster types as well

Also, disabled the tests that run based out of DRA's beta API as we don't enable the beta APIs downstream and only depend on the GA'ed APIs

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Enables the DRA related tests to be run for all the techpreview jobs

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

This is to get some signal from sippy so that the featuregate can be removed/enable for the all/default cluster types

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
"NONE"
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Oct 1, 2025

openshift-ci bot added the kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. label Oct 1, 2025

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 1, 2025

openshift-ci bot requested review from bertinatto, deads2k and lyman9966 October 1, 2025 08:19

sairameshv mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2025

OCPNODE-3895,OCPNODE-3894,OCPNODE-3779: Enable DRA(DynamicResourceAllocation) featuregate by default openshift/api#2498

Open

sairameshv force-pushed the enable_DRA branch from 5385fe7 to d35f108 Compare October 8, 2025 07:36

sairameshv force-pushed the enable_DRA branch from d35f108 to 5fe5276 Compare October 8, 2025 13:31

openshift-ci bot requested a review from tkashem October 8, 2025 13:32

sairameshv force-pushed the enable_DRA branch from 5fe5276 to c348e5d Compare October 8, 2025 14:41

sairameshv commented Oct 8, 2025

View reviewed changes

sairameshv closed this Oct 9, 2025

OCPBUGS-61381: Enable DRA related tests from OCP-4.21 #2482

OCPBUGS-61381: Enable DRA related tests from OCP-4.21 #2482

Uh oh!

Conversation

sairameshv commented Oct 1, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 1, 2025

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

sairameshv commented Oct 1, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2025

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2025

Uh oh!

sairameshv commented Oct 8, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2025

Uh oh!

sairameshv Oct 8, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Uh oh!

sairameshv commented Oct 9, 2025

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2025

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

sairameshv commented Oct 1, 2025 •

edited

Loading

sairameshv Oct 8, 2025 •

edited

Loading