Skip to content

Conversation

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

@gnufied gnufied commented May 1, 2025

Where recovery from volume expansion feature is not enabled.

cc @openshift/storage

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gnufied: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55632, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Where recovery from volume expansion feature is not enabled.

cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gnufied: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from benluddy and deads2k May 1, 2025 15:21
@gnufied
Copy link
Member Author

gnufied commented May 1, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gnufied: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55632, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gnufied gnufied force-pushed the fix-expansion-recover-disabled-older-kubelet-ocp-master branch from 51d7128 to 7d585bc Compare May 1, 2025 16:02
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. and removed backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. labels May 1, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gnufied: the contents of this pull request could be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@gnufied
Copy link
Member Author

gnufied commented May 1, 2025

/retest

@dobsonj
Copy link
Member

dobsonj commented May 2, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 2, 2025
@gnufied
Copy link
Member Author

gnufied commented May 2, 2025

/retest

Copy link
Member

@bertinatto bertinatto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, dobsonj, gnufied

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 5, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 83565d5 and 2 for PR HEAD 7d585bc in total

@Phaow
Copy link

Phaow commented May 6, 2025

/retest-required

@gnufied
Copy link
Member Author

gnufied commented May 6, 2025

So looks like - "tideWaiting for status to be reported — Not mergeable. Job ci/prow/verify-deps has not succeeded."

verify-deps is still required for this PR. I am going to close this PR and open another one.

@bertinatto
Copy link
Member

/override ci/prow/verify-deps
This was removed.

@gnufied gnufied closed this May 6, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 6, 2025

@bertinatto: Overrode contexts on behalf of bertinatto: ci/prow/verify-deps

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/verify-deps
This was removed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gnufied: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55632. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

Details

In response to this:

Where recovery from volume expansion feature is not enabled.

cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@gnufied gnufied reopened this May 6, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 6, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gnufied: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55632, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.20." or "openshift-4.20.", but it targets "4.19.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Where recovery from volume expansion feature is not enabled.

cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 6, 2025
@gnufied
Copy link
Member Author

gnufied commented May 6, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 6, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gnufied: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55632, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @chao007

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from chao007 May 6, 2025 20:27
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 83565d5 and 2 for PR HEAD 7d585bc in total

2 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 83565d5 and 2 for PR HEAD 7d585bc in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 83565d5 and 2 for PR HEAD 7d585bc in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 7, 2025

@gnufied: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify-deps 7d585bc link false /test verify-deps
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd 7d585bc link false /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 7d585bc link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit aa347f0 into openshift:master May 7, 2025
21 of 23 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@gnufied: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55632: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55632 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Where recovery from volume expansion feature is not enabled.

cc @openshift/storage

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-pod
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-pod-container-v4.20.0-202505071142.p0.gaa347f0.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: kube-proxy
This PR has been included in build kube-proxy-container-v4.20.0-202505071142.p0.gaa347f0.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-kube-apiserver-artifacts
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-kube-apiserver-artifacts-container-v4.20.0-202505071142.p0.gaa347f0.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-hyperkube
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-hyperkube-container-v4.20.0-202505071142.p0.gaa347f0.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@gnufied
Copy link
Member Author

gnufied commented May 7, 2025

/cherry-pick release-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@gnufied: new pull request created: #2289

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@gnufied
Copy link
Member Author

gnufied commented May 15, 2025

/cherry-pick release-4.18

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@gnufied: #2282 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.18":

Applying: UPSTREAM: 131418: Check for newer fields when deciding expansion recovery feature status
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/node_expander.go
M	pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/node_expander_test.go
M	pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/operation_generator.go
M	pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/operation_generator_test.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/operation_generator_test.go
Auto-merging pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/operation_generator.go
Auto-merging pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/node_expander_test.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/node_expander_test.go
Auto-merging pkg/volume/util/operationexecutor/node_expander.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 UPSTREAM: 131418: Check for newer fields when deciding expansion recovery feature status

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants