-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-46470: Power VS: ResourceManager also to override for Internal deploy #9317
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
OCPBUGS-46470: Power VS: ResourceManager also to override for Internal deploy #9317
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Hiro Miyamoto <[email protected]>
/lgtm |
/retitle OCPBUGS-46470: Power VS: ResourceManager also to override for Internal deploy |
@miyamotoh: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46470, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira-refresh |
/assign r4f4 |
/test e2e-powervs-capi-ovn |
/jira refresh |
@mjturek: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46470, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: juliemathew. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/test e2e-powervs-capi-ovn |
@miyamotoh: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@r4f4 there seems to be some ongoing issues with CI due to resource contention. I've deployed with these changes myself and it went without a hitch
|
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: r4f4 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Further debugging revealed
ResourceManager
endpoint must also be overridden for Disconnected deploy on PowerVS with CAPI. Like #9143, this PR starts setting/passingResourceManager
override to CCM.One thing that's perhaps noteworthy is that we are adding logic of those endpoint overrides to be in
platformStatus
as well (as inplatformSpec
) inpkg/asset/manifests/infrastructure.go
, which should be the way, rather thanmachine-controller
container inmachine-api-controllers
pod trying to updateplatformStatus
which RBAC blocks.