Skip to content

Conversation

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

CVO has moved to using `clusterversion.config.openshift.io` for its configurations and the
legacy `cvoconfig` is not required.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 27, 2018
@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 28, 2018

c422a24 looks good to me. I'm fine landing this PR as it stands if you'd rather sort out the graph issues in follow-up work.

The older names lack the uniquenes `OpenshiftServiceCertSignerNamespace` is now `bootkube.OpenshiftServiceCertSignerNamespace` which much
more clearer. It also fixes collisions for `Masters` in `asset/machines` and `asset/ignition`
@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we want to use asset.Name() here? If not, do we want to drop asset.Name entirely?

asset.Name is human-friendly name for the asset. the graph needs a unique enough name for the node.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 28, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 28, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [abhinavdahiya,wking]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 30, 2018

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Nov 30, 2018

e2e-aws:

W1130 07:42:18.873990    9061 metrics_grabber.go:81] Master node is not registered. Grabbing metrics from Scheduler, ControllerManager and ClusterAutoscaler is disabled.
Nov 30 07:42:18.985: INFO: 
Latency metrics for node ip-10-0-43-214.ec2.internal
STEP: Deleting namespaces
Nov 30 07:42:19.024: INFO: namespace : e2e-test-jenkins-pipeline-zqzmw api call to delete is complete 
STEP: Waiting for namespaces to vanish
[AfterEach] [Top Level]
  /tmp/openshift/build-rpms/rpm/BUILD/origin-4.0.0/_output/local/go/src/github.com/openshift/origin/vendor/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:142
STEP: Dumping a list of prepulled images on each node...
Nov 30 07:42:27.074: INFO: Waiting up to 3m0s for all (but 100) nodes to be ready
Nov 30 07:42:27.107: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on all node
Nov 30 07:42:27.107: INFO: Running AfterSuite actions on node 1
fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/deployments/deployments.go:541]: Expected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc420091570>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
not to have occurred

failed: (6m14s) "[Feature:DeploymentConfig] deploymentconfigs with multiple image change triggers [Conformance] should run a successful deployment with a trigger used by different containers [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal] [Suite:openshift/smoke-4]"

/retest

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Dec 1, 2018

e2e-aws was bit by the race fixed by #769. I'll kick this again after that lands.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Dec 1, 2018

#769 landed.

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Dec 1, 2018

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@abhinavdahiya: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt aa1971a link /test e2e-libvirt

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@rajatchopra rajatchopra mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants