Skip to content

Conversation

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member

Add support for CPMSO for Power VS platform, Initially it will be in Inactive state, Later based on the feedback we can by default make it active.

opesnhift/api changes PR: openshift/api#1415
openshfit/machine-api-provider-powervs changes: openshift/machine-api-provider-powervs#41

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

Wait for testing and merging of openshift/machine-api-provider-powervs#41 PR

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 2, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from rna-afk and sadasu June 2, 2023 05:14
@Karthik-K-N Karthik-K-N force-pushed the powervs-cpms-support branch 2 times, most recently from 3730b42 to ec043c0 Compare June 7, 2023 09:55
@Karthik-K-N Karthik-K-N changed the title Add support for CPMSO for Power VS MULTIARCH-3667: Add support for CPMSO for Power VS Jun 7, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 7, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jun 7, 2023

@Karthik-K-N: This pull request references MULTIARCH-3667 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Add support for CPMSO for Power VS platform, Initially it will be in Inactive state, Later based on the feedback we can by default make it active.

opesnhift/api changes PR: openshift/api#1415
openshfit/machine-api-provider-powervs changes: openshift/machine-api-provider-powervs#41

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 7, 2023
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @mkumatag @mjturek @AshwinHIBM

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from AshwinHIBM, mjturek and mkumatag June 7, 2023 12:43
@rna-afk
Copy link
Contributor

rna-afk commented Jun 7, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 7, 2023
@Karthik-K-N Karthik-K-N force-pushed the powervs-cpms-support branch from ec043c0 to c6e4d35 Compare June 16, 2023 05:04
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2023
Copy link
Member

@mkumatag mkumatag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 16, 2023
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

@rna-afk could you please help in merging this PR

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/test ?

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 14, 2023

@patrickdillon: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test agent-integration-tests
  • /test aro-unit
  • /test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-openstack-ovn
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
  • /test e2e-vsphere-upi
  • /test gofmt
  • /test golint
  • /test govet
  • /test images
  • /test okd-images
  • /test okd-scos-images
  • /test okd-unit
  • /test okd-verify-codegen
  • /test openstack-manifests
  • /test shellcheck
  • /test tf-lint
  • /test unit
  • /test verify-codegen
  • /test verify-vendor
  • /test yaml-lint

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-agent-ha-dualstack
  • /test e2e-agent-sno-ipv4-pxe
  • /test e2e-agent-sno-ipv6
  • /test e2e-alibaba
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-imdsv2
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-localzones
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-proxy
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-public-subnets
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8
  • /test e2e-aws-upi-proxy
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-resourcegroup
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test e2e-azurestack
  • /test e2e-azurestack-upi
  • /test e2e-crc
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-xpn
  • /test e2e-gcp-secureboot
  • /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-upi-xpn
  • /test e2e-ibmcloud-ovn
  • /test e2e-libvirt
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-swapped-hosts
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-virtualmedia
  • /test e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso
  • /test e2e-nutanix-ovn
  • /test e2e-nutanix-sdn
  • /test e2e-openstack-externallb
  • /test e2e-openstack-kuryr
  • /test e2e-openstack-proxy
  • /test e2e-openstack-sdn-parallel
  • /test e2e-openstack-upi
  • /test e2e-vsphere-static-ovn
  • /test e2e-vsphere-upi-zones
  • /test e2e-vsphere-zones
  • /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • /test okd-e2e-vsphere
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-gcp
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-vsphere
  • /test okd-scos-unit
  • /test okd-scos-verify-codegen
  • /test tf-fmt

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-aro-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-agent-ha-dualstack
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-gofmt
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-golint
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-govet
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-verify-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-verify-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-shellcheck
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-tf-fmt
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-tf-lint
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-verify-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-verify-vendor
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-yaml-lint
Details

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@patrickdillon patrickdillon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Is there a powervs sme that can review/lgtm?

for _, machine := range machines {
providerSpec, ok := machine.Spec.ProviderSpec.Value.Object.(*machinev1.PowerVSMachineProviderConfig)
if !ok {
return errors.New("Unable to set load balancers to control plane machine set")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: errors should start with a lowercase letter, but no need to change this unless you're making other changes


providerSpec, ok := controlPlane.Spec.Template.OpenShiftMachineV1Beta1Machine.Spec.ProviderSpec.Value.Object.(*machinev1.PowerVSMachineProviderConfig)
if !ok {
return errors.New("Unable to set load balancers to control plane machine set")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: errors should start with a lowercase letter, but no need to change this unless you're making other changes

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 14, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mkumatag, patrickdillon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 14, 2023
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

/approve

Is there a powervs sme that can review/lgtm?

Thank you, Its already been reviewed and approved from Power VS team #7226 (review)

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
based on #7226 (review)

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 169ffbf and 2 for PR HEAD c6e4d35 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 12030a6 and 1 for PR HEAD c6e4d35 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ec459b1 and 0 for PR HEAD c6e4d35 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 16, 2023

@Karthik-K-N: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 79a013e into openshift:master Jul 16, 2023
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

@Karthik-K-N Looks like this is still inactive by default? Any reason not to be making these active?

Also, do you intend to have upgraded clusters add CPMSs? On other platforms we have a generator in the CPMS repo itself that creates CPMSs based on the existing Machines in the cluster, in an inactive state

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Member Author

We started with inactive state thinking to have enough testing done before making it active. @juliemathew If testing looks or if there is not anything concerning, Shall I make it active by default.

Initially I thought its not required to have generator as at that time PowerVS was still in TP mode. @mkumatag do you think we need to cover this scenario as well?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants