Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #6694

/assign dlom

Hive vendors the installer and uses the asset package to generate
machinesets for scaleup. Because Hive is using the latest code version
but installing multiple previous versions, the machinesets--particularly
the values--need to be backward compatible.

In this particular case, the installer switched from using Azure
managed images to image galleries in 4.12. In 4.12+ Azure machinesets
expect an image referencing an image gallery, while prior to this change
the machinesets looked for a managed image.

This commit updates the machineset code to allow a toggle which will
allow Hive to generate Azure machinesets utilizing managed images,
which should be done with 4.11 and earlier clusters.

This change also future proofs the 4.12+ by switching the machinesets
to use the latest version, rather than tying them to a particular RHCOS
version.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4809 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4995. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-4995: Azure: toggle image in machinesets

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #6694

/assign dlom

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-4809: Azure: toggle image in machinesets [release-4.12] OCPBUGS-4995: Azure: toggle image in machinesets Dec 16, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.12] OCPBUGS-4995: Azure: toggle image in machinesets

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 16, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4995, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.12.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.12.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4809 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4809 targets the "4.13.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.13.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gpei

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #6694

/assign dlom

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from gpei, mtulio and sadasu December 16, 2022 22:31
@dlom
Copy link
Contributor

dlom commented Dec 16, 2022

/cc @patrickdillon

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from patrickdillon December 16, 2022 22:49
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Dec 17, 2022

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: r4f4

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 17, 2022
@dlom
Copy link
Contributor

dlom commented Dec 19, 2022

/retest-required

@dlom
Copy link
Contributor

dlom commented Dec 19, 2022

All of the required tests have passed; are the e2e tests just timing out or is there a failure lurking? I don't want to spam CI with jobs that will just keep timing out.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Dec 19, 2022

All of the required tests have passed; are the e2e tests just timing out or is there a failure lurking? I don't want to spam CI with jobs that will just keep timing out.

I think the only thing stopping this PR from merging right now is the missing labels: backport-risk-assessed, cherry-pick-approved and lgtm.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Dec 19, 2022

/label tide/merge-method-squash

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Dec 19, 2022
@dlom
Copy link
Contributor

dlom commented Dec 19, 2022

I think the only thing stopping this PR from merging right now is the missing labels: backport-risk-assessed, cherry-pick-approved and lgtm.

Who can I bug to get this done? I'm hoping to get this merged before January if possible :shipit:

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Dec 19, 2022

I think the only thing stopping this PR from merging right now is the missing labels: backport-risk-assessed, cherry-pick-approved and lgtm.

Who can I bug to get this done? I'm hoping to get this merged before January if possible :shipit:

backport-risk-assessed == Patrick
cherry-pick-approved == installer QE. gpei has been notified but I think he's on PTO. Try asking @installer-qe-team on Slack.
lgtm == any installer dev, will probably be added by Patrick.

@dlom
Copy link
Contributor

dlom commented Dec 19, 2022

Thanks @r4f4 !

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Dec 19, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 19, 2022
@MayXuQQ
Copy link
Contributor

MayXuQQ commented Dec 20, 2022

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Dec 20, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 20, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack 80167ac link false /test e2e-azurestack
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 80167ac link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud-ovn 80167ac link false /test e2e-ibmcloud-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-crc 80167ac link false /test e2e-crc
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade 80167ac link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 80167ac link false /test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8 80167ac link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive 80167ac link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 80167ac link false /test e2e-libvirt

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 37c37ad and 2 for PR HEAD 80167ac in total

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bbf5482 into openshift:release-4.12 Dec 20, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-4995 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #6694

/assign dlom

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants