Skip to content

Conversation

@rvanderp3
Copy link
Contributor

@rvanderp3 rvanderp3 commented Oct 6, 2022

validate VIPs are in machineNetwork in survey. validation was added for vsphere, ovirt, and nutanix.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 6, 2022

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 6, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 6, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rvanderp3: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-881, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.12.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.12.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jinyunma

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

validate VIPs are in machineNetwork in survey

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 6, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jinyunma October 6, 2022 16:50
@rvanderp3
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere
/test e2e-nutanix

@rvanderp3
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-vsphere /test e2e-nutanix

hmmm, these tests don't really test the behavior since these are install-config survey changes. We'll run them anyway though.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rvanderp3: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-881, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.12.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.12.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jinyunma

Details

In response to this:

validate VIPs are in machineNetwork in survey. validation was added for vsphere, ovirt, and nutanix.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rvanderp3 rvanderp3 marked this pull request as ready for review October 6, 2022 16:58
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 6, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from barbacbd and bkhizgiy October 6, 2022 16:58
@rvanderp3
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc: @patrickdillon

@rna-afk
Copy link
Contributor

rna-afk commented Oct 6, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 6, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@patrickdillon patrickdillon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Comment on lines 271 to 273
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: It might be simpler/less confusing to export defaultMachineCIDR from package types/defaults; because I wonder if this implies "we're creating the install config here", which we're not.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, I was torn on that tbh. My concern was that based on the platform, that defaultMachineCIDR might not be the actual defaultMachineCIDR. While this doesn't impact any current onprem platforms, I was concerned this might cause some confusion down the line. another option here might be to pull the logic out of SetInstallConfigDefaults that determines the final defaultMachineCIDR of the platform.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thinking about this a little more, I think i'll go ahead and revert to your suggestion here.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 7, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: patrickdillon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 7, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7b739cd and 2 for PR HEAD d6f29ad6ba1cf7bdea2b2b35e21574bdaa5c439e in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD bb20681 and 1 for PR HEAD d6f29ad6ba1cf7bdea2b2b35e21574bdaa5c439e in total

@rvanderp3
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold
placing a hold to address comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 7, 2022
…VIP are not in machine networks

validate VIPs are in machineNetwork in survey
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 7, 2022
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel
/skip

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 10, 2023
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

This is just failing on a flake unrelated to this PR.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 10, 2023

@patrickdillon: Overrode contexts on behalf of patrickdillon: ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn

This is just failing on a flake unrelated to this PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ed8b918 and 2 for PR HEAD e883e0c in total

@rvanderp3
Copy link
Contributor Author

hmmmm ... something has changed. taking a look.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 10, 2023
@rvanderp3
Copy link
Contributor Author

looks like linting rules changed. ive pushed an update.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Jan 10, 2023

looks like linting rules changed. ive pushed an update.

Correct. We've standardized the import order [1] and replaced the deprecated linter by a new one.

[1] https://github.com/openshift/installer/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#import-order

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Jan 10, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 10, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD ed8b918 and 2 for PR HEAD 532bd4c in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 01ebce5 and 1 for PR HEAD 532bd4c in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 14878f7 and 0 for PR HEAD 532bd4c in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision 532bd4c was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 11, 2023
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel
/skip

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 11, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 14878f7 and 2 for PR HEAD 532bd4c in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 11, 2023

@rvanderp3: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade d6f29ad6ba1cf7bdea2b2b35e21574bdaa5c439e link false /test okd-scos-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-vsphere d6f29ad6ba1cf7bdea2b2b35e21574bdaa5c439e link false /test okd-scos-e2e-vsphere
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-gcp d6f29ad6ba1cf7bdea2b2b35e21574bdaa5c439e link false /test okd-scos-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt e883e0c link false /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade e883e0c link false /test okd-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted e883e0c link false /test e2e-metal-assisted
ci/prow/e2e-agent-mce e883e0c link false /test e2e-agent-mce
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud-ovn e883e0c link false /test e2e-ibmcloud-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-nutanix e883e0c link false /test e2e-nutanix
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive 532bd4c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 532bd4c link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-nutanix-ovn 532bd4c link false /test e2e-nutanix-ovn
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade 532bd4c link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 532bd4c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 532bd4c link false /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-ovirt-sdn 532bd4c link false /test e2e-ovirt-sdn
ci/prow/e2e-nutanix-sdn 532bd4c link false /test e2e-nutanix-sdn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD face870 and 1 for PR HEAD 532bd4c in total

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit db4ac4d into openshift:master Jan 12, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rvanderp3: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-881 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

validate VIPs are in machineNetwork in survey. validation was added for vsphere, ovirt, and nutanix.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rvanderp3
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick release-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@rvanderp3: new pull request created: #6783

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants