[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers #6411

jhixson74 · 2022-09-23T21:12:22Z

Backports #6352

Update go-getter to v1.6.2 to address several vulnerabilities. (cherry picked from commit 00ac3a2)

openshift-ci · 2022-09-23T21:12:29Z

@jhixson74: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2101015, which is invalid:

expected Bugzilla bug 2101015 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.12.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

jhixson74 · 2022-09-23T21:14:55Z

/remove-label bugzilla/invalid-bug
/label bugzilla/valid-bug

openshift-ci · 2022-09-23T21:15:10Z

@jhixson74: Can not set label bugzilla/valid-bug: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers openshift-staff-engineers]

Details

In response to this:

/remove-label bugzilla/invalid-bug
/label bugzilla/valid-bug

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2022-09-23T21:15:11Z

@jhixson74: The label(s) /remove-label bugzilla/invalid-bug cannot be applied. These labels are supported: platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, downstream-change-needed, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, jira/valid-bug, staff-eng-approved

Details

In response to this:

/remove-label bugzilla/invalid-bug
/label bugzilla/valid-bug

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Update go-getter to v1.6.2 to address several vulnerabilities. (cherry picked from commit 3f4a6ab)

Update go-getter to v1.6.2 to address several vulnerabilities. (cherry picked from commit 6daa70c)

jhixson74 · 2022-09-26T18:15:01Z

/retest

patrickdillon · 2022-10-04T01:05:19Z

/approve

To get the valid bug label you'll need to set the bz to be dependent on the 4.12 bz

openshift-ci · 2022-10-04T01:06:10Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: patrickdillon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [patrickdillon]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

r4f4 · 2022-10-04T09:05:24Z

/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-ibmcloud
/test e2e-libvirt

sadasu · 2022-10-10T18:04:15Z

/retest

openshift-ci · 2022-10-10T21:34:57Z

@jhixson74: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack	`dab59a1`	link	false	`/test e2e-azurestack`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upi-proxy	`dab59a1`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-upi-proxy`
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt	`dab59a1`	link	false	`/test e2e-libvirt`
ci/prow/e2e-crc	`dab59a1`	link	false	`/test e2e-crc`
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud	`dab59a1`	link	false	`/test e2e-ibmcloud`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-ci · 2022-10-11T13:17:27Z

@jhixson74: An error was encountered searching for bug 2101015 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message.


Get "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/rest/bug/2101015?include_fields=_default&include_fields=flags": net/http: TLS handshake timeout

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sadasu · 2022-10-11T13:42:04Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci · 2022-10-11T13:43:12Z

@sadasu: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2101015, which is invalid:

expected Bugzilla bug 2101015 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.12.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sdodson · 2022-10-11T14:24:39Z

Adding bugzilla/valid-bug as this backports changes which merged into master which had no bug associated at the time. Since we can no longer create bugzillas we've created a JIRA requesting that QE test that https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-2211

sadasu · 2022-10-11T14:44:14Z

/lgtm

patrickdillon · 2022-10-11T15:07:41Z

/label backport-risk-assessed

gpei · 2022-10-12T00:37:50Z

/label cherry-pick-approved

openshift-ci-robot · 2022-10-12T05:57:22Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 48f2feb and 2 for PR HEAD dab59a1 in total

openshift-ci · 2022-10-12T07:01:47Z

@jhixson74: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2101015 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

terraform & terraform providers: update go-getter to v1.6.2

c0aaa40

Update go-getter to v1.6.2 to address several vulnerabilities. (cherry picked from commit 00ac3a2)

openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 23, 2022

jhixson74 mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2022

[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers #6406

Closed

openshift-ci bot requested review from barbacbd and bkhizgiy September 23, 2022 21:13

jhixson74 added 2 commits September 23, 2022 14:41

terraform & terraform providers: go mod tidy

ee692a7

Update go-getter to v1.6.2 to address several vulnerabilities. (cherry picked from commit 3f4a6ab)

terraform & terraform providers: go mod vendor

dab59a1

Update go-getter to v1.6.2 to address several vulnerabilities. (cherry picked from commit 6daa70c)

jhixson74 force-pushed the release-4.11-go-getter-update branch from 3a9745d to dab59a1 Compare September 23, 2022 21:41

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 4, 2022

sdodson added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 11, 2022

openshift-ci bot assigned sadasu Oct 11, 2022

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 11, 2022

openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 11, 2022

openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Oct 12, 2022

openshift-merge-robot merged commit fc71da4 into openshift:release-4.11 Oct 12, 2022

r4f4 mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2022

OCPBUGS-2739: Uplift terraform-provider-ironic to 0.3.0 #6636

Closed

[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers #6411

[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers #6411

Uh oh!

Conversation

jhixson74 commented Sep 23, 2022 • edited by sdodson Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2022

Uh oh!

jhixson74 commented Sep 23, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2022

Uh oh!

jhixson74 commented Sep 26, 2022

Uh oh!

patrickdillon commented Oct 4, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2022

Uh oh!

r4f4 commented Oct 4, 2022

Uh oh!

sadasu commented Oct 10, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 10, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2022

Uh oh!

sadasu commented Oct 11, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 11, 2022

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Oct 11, 2022

Uh oh!

sadasu commented Oct 11, 2022

Uh oh!

patrickdillon commented Oct 11, 2022

Uh oh!

gpei commented Oct 12, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 12, 2022

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 12, 2022

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

jhixson74 commented Sep 23, 2022 •

edited by sdodson

Loading