Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #6352

/assign jhixson74

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Sep 22, 2022

/retitle [release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.11] go getter update for terraform & terraform providers [release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers Sep 22, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 22, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2101015, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 2101015 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.12.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from barbacbd and sadasu September 22, 2022 14:04
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 22, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sdodson for approval by writing /assign @sdodson in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Sep 22, 2022

So running go mod -compat=1.18 in 4.12+ versus go mod -compat=1.17 in <=4.11 is causing differences in some Readme.md files in the vendored code?

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link false /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link false /test e2e-ibmcloud
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link false /test e2e-vsphere
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upi-proxy eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link false /test e2e-aws-upi-proxy
ci/prow/e2e-crc eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link false /test e2e-crc
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link false /test e2e-azurestack
ci/prow/e2e-alibaba eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link false /test e2e-alibaba
ci/prow/verify-vendor eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link true /test verify-vendor
ci/prow/e2e-openstack eb6fe0b74379a90fddcd6e7b5fcd023327f89199 link false /test e2e-openstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jhixson74
Copy link
Member

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Sep 22, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@jhixson74: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered removing this pull request from the external tracker bugs for bug 2101015 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. response code 400 not 200

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.11] Bug 2101015: go getter update for terraform & terraform providers

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jhixson74
Copy link
Member

/open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants